Novel germ cell ablation compounds and uses thereof

ABSTRACT

Provided herein are methods of sterilizing fish by contacting an embryonic or juvenile fish with a compound of formula (I). In some embodiments, the compound is primordazine or a derivative thereof.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser.No. 14/206,135 filed Mar. 12, 2014, and claims benefit under 35 U.S.C.§119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/777,274 filed Mar. 12,2013, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in itsentirety.

SEQUENCE LISTING

The instant application contains a Sequence Listing which has beensubmitted electronically in ASCII format and is hereby incorporated byreference in its entirety. Said ASCII copy, created on Dec. 1, 2016, isnamed 030258-077012-C_SL.txt and is 2,386 bytes in size.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

According to data from the United Nations Food and AgricultureOrganization (FAO), world seafood consumption has doubled every 20 to 25years since 1950 [FAO. 2007 Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics. Rome:Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2007]. Todayfish from most traditional fisheries are being harvested at maximumyields, while fish populations in almost all commercial marine fisheriesaround the world arc undergoing a dramatic decrease due to over-fishing.In the United States seafood consumption has increased 60% since 1960and approximately 85% of this demand each year is met by imported fishand shellfish resulting in approximately $7 billion annual tradedeficits in edible fishery products [NOAA. Fish Watch U.S. Seafood Fact.In; 2010. See world wide web address:nmfs.noaa.gov/fishwatch/trade_and_aquaculture.htm].

Aquaculture, also known as “fish farming,” is becoming increasinglyimportant to offset this deficiency in aquatic foods production, anddramatic increases in aquaculture production have been made over thelast few decades. From 2002 to 2007 annual aquaculture productionincreased from 36.8 million tons to 50.3 million tons with a total valueof $87 billion [FAO. 2007 Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics. Rome: Foodand Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2007]. As this shiftin dependence from wild populations to artificially propagated aquaticspecies continues, optimization of aquaculture methods will be necessaryto maximize food production.

According to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the UnitedNations, nearly 70% of the fish species in the world's commercial marinefisheries are now fully exploited, overexploited or depleted. Based onanticipated population growth, it is estimated that the world's demandfor seafood will double by the year 2025. Therefore, a growing gap isdeveloping between demand and supply of fisheries products, whichresults in a growing seafood deficit. Even the most favorable estimatesproject that in the year 2025, the global demand for seafood will betwice as much as the commercial fisheries will harvest.

The same trend exists in the United States marketplace. Per capitaseafood consumption is on the rise, but United States seafood harvestsare not increasing to meet the demand. Moreover, only 10% of the seafoodconsumed in the United States comes from domestic aquaculture and theUnited States ranks only tenth in the world in the value of itsaquaculture production. As a result, the United States is overwhelminglydependent on imported seafood, such as gilthead and seabream, with morethan half of its supplies coming from overseas.

Worldwide, it is estimated that in order to close the increasing gapbetween the demand and supply of commercially produced fish, aquaculturewill need to augment production five-fold during the next two and halfdecades. While there is a need to increase aquaculture productionglobally and in the United States, it is clear that fish farming mustdevelop as a sustainable industry without having an adverse impact onthe environment.

In commercial fish species where sexual maturation occurs before thefish has reached market size, energy is spent on gonadal growth insteadof muscle growth. Sterility increases the conversion of food energy tomuscle (thereby resulting in larger fish fillets) and minimizes foodenergy diverted for development of the gonads. Another advantage of fishsterilization is that it minimizes the potential negative impact ofgenetically modified fish on the environment, because withoutsterilization escape of genetically-modified cultured fish may threatenthe ecological balance or lead to genetic contamination of wildpopulations. This threat will become even greater as transgenic fish areraised in commercial operations in the United States and abroad.

Aquaculture experts around the world agree that a mechanically simple,but effective, process that bypasses the traditional modes of inducingsterility would increase production efficiency, profitability andbiosecurity in commercial aquaculture. Sterilizing transgenic orgenetically-selected fish will minimize the possibility these fishpropagating in the wild, an especially important consideration in lightof alarming reports of interbreeding between escaped animals and wildpopulations of the same species, which seem to be increasing in areas ofintensive farming (Volpe et al., 2001; Carr et al., 1997).

Several methods currently exist to induce sterility in fish. One methodis manipulation of the chromosome number by triploidization orinterspecies hybridization and another is the disruption of thegonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) pathway using antisense RNA ortreatment with gamma amino butyric acid (GABA).

Chromosome set manipulation for the production of triploid sterilepopulations is used but it is a cumbersome procedure that must beindividually developed for each species. Furthermore, generation oftriploids does not always result in sterility. In induced-triploidrainbow trout (Arai, 2001) and Atlantic salmon (Donaldson and Benfey,1987), males were seldom completely sterile. Because they maintain mostof their endocrine competence, these salmonids also exhibit secondarysex characteristics, and as a consequence are susceptible to disease andexhibit no improvement in growth over diploids. Likewise, femaletriploid Atlantic salmon are commonly found to have a few normal oocyteswithin the ovarian matrix (Johnstone, 1993). Like CSM,inter-hybridization (or hybrid production) is a labor-intensive processthat does not always result in sterility, as is clearly the case withthe hybrid striped bass.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) is a pituitary hormone that isrequired to maintain a normal reproductive cycle in vertebrates.Specifically, GnRH stimulates the synthesis and secretion of thegonadotropins: follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizinghormone (LH). Generally, the gonads are the primary target organs for LHand FSH. LH and FSH are integral to the reproductive system andinhibition of GnRH signaling and, therefore, disruption of the synthesisand secretion of LH and FSH is a potent method to induce infertility.

Disruption of the GnRH pathway has been accomplished in several speciesof fish by the introduction of a transgene that encodes antisense RNAthat blocks endogenous GnRH expression [Uzbekova S, et al., “Transgenicrainbow trout expressed sGnRH-antisense RNA under the control of sGnRHpromoter of Atlantic salmon.” J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2000; 25: 337-350; HuW, et al. “Antisense for gonadotropin-releasing hormone reducesgonadotropin synthesis and gonadal development in transgenic common carp(Cyprinus carpio).” Aquaculture 2007; 271: 498-506.]. Some studies haveshown however that low levels of GnRH expression persist in thetransgenic fish resulting in a failure to completely induce sterility(Uzbekova S, et al., “Transgenic rainbow trout expressed sGnRH-antisenseRNA under the control of sGnRH promoter of Atlantic salmon.” J. Mol.Endocrinol. 2000, 25: 337-350)

Another disadvantage of this strategy is that it is difficult tomaintain a fertile population of fish for brood stock. Since the geneencoding the antisense RNA is integrated into the genome andcontinuously expressed, all of the fish will carry it, making itnecessary to administer exogenous GnRH to individual fish by injectionto maintain a fertile brood stock population.

Additionally, GnRH injection of brood stock is not practical in alarge-scale commercial aquaculture operation.

Treatment with γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) has also been proposed todisrupt the GnRH signaling pathway in fish [U.S. Pat. No. 7,194,978.].Since GABA regulates GnRH neuron development in the embryo, treatmentwith exogenous GABA is able to disrupt the formation and normalmigration pattern of the GnRH neurons [Fueshko S M, et al., “GABAinhibits migration of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone neurons inembryonic olfactory explants.” J Neurosci 1998; 18: 2560-2569.].Although this approach has been used successfully in the laboratory, itis not practical on a commercial scale due to the expense and laborrequired to treat large populations of fish. Also, the treatment affectsother physiological and neurological functions in addition to gonaddevelopment in the fish.

As a result of the above constraints, the production of sterile fish,although considered highly beneficial to commercial aquaculture, has notyet been developed for mass use in the industry. Thus, it would beadvantageous to develop a method and system to induce permanentsterility in fish grown in commercial operations that overcomes theproblems of the previous unsuccessful methods used for sterilization.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a simple and generic technology forinducing sterility in farmed fish by disrupting gonadal development,thereby creating fish having more muscle (desirable tissue) and lessgonad (undesirable tissue).

An aspect of the present invention relates to a method of inducingsterility in fish, wherein the sterilization method comprises contactinga fish with primordazine or a derivative thereof.

A further aspect of the invention relates to a method of producing areproductively controllable fish, including contacting fish withprimordazine or a derivative thereof.

Another aspect of the present invention relates to a sterile fishobtained by a method of the present invention.

Another aspect of the present invention relates to a kit fordistributing compounds that disrupts a primordazine response element infish and instructions to effectively sterilize fish.

Other aspects, features and embodiments of the invention will be morefully apparent from the ensuing disclosure and appended claims.

It is understood that the foregoing detailed description and thefollowing examples are illustrative only and are not to be taken aslimitations upon the scope of the invention. Various changes andmodifications to the disclosed embodiments, which will be apparent tothose of skill in the art, may be made without departing from the spiritand scope of the present invention. Further, all patents, patentapplications, and publications identified are expressly incorporatedherein by reference for the purpose of describing and disclosing, forexample, the methodologies described in such publications that might beused in connection with the present invention. These publications areprovided solely for their disclosure prior to the filing date of thepresent application. Nothing in this regard should be construed as anadmission that the inventors are not entitled to antedate suchdisclosure by virtue of prior invention or for any other reason. Allstatements as to the date or representation as to the contents of thesedocuments are based on the information available to the applicants anddo not constitute any admission as to the correctness of the dates orcontents of these documents.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIGS. 1A-1B illustrate that primordazine ablates PGCs. (FIG. 1A) Thevasa:GFP transgenic shows PGCs at the gonadal ridge (arrows) inDMSO-treated embryos. PGC numbers are reduced by treatment withprimordazine. (FIG. 1B) Loss of PGCs is confirmed by in situhybridization with three PGC-specific markers, vasa, nanos1, anddeadend.

FIGS. 2A-2B illustrate that primordazine functions through a 40-baseprimordazine response element in 3′ UTRs. The nanos1 3′ UTR issufficient to make GFP translation conditional. (FIG. 2A) GFP RNA withthe nanos1 3′ UTR and mutated miR-430 site (GFP-Nos1) is injected, andGFP is translated throughout the embryo. Translation is blocked byprimordazine treatment. Primordazine sensitivity is conferred by theentire nanos1 3′ UTR (Nos1) or the 40-base primordazine response element(PRE), but not by the globin 3′ UTR (globin). (FIG. 2B) The primordazineresponse element can be narrowed to a 40-base sequence from the nanos13′ UTR by assays as shown in FIG. 2A.

FIG. 3 illustrates that primordazine alters the localization of nanos1mRNA. Whole-mount, fluorescent in situ hybridization of endogenousnanos1 mRNA enabled visualization of nanos1 localization in primordialgerm cells. Primordazine treatment causes a consistent relocalization ofnanos1 mRNA from a diffuse, cytoplasmic pattern to discrete puncta.Imaging by confocal microscopy.

FIGS. 4A-4D illustrate the synthesis of an affinity matrix, anddiscovery of a primordazine-binding helicase. (FIG. 4A) StructureActivity Relationship (SAR) studies enabled optimization of primordazineand identification of a site allowing addition of a covalent linker. Forexample, additions to the indole nitrogen are well tolerated. (FIG. 4B)Synthesis and purification of the modified primordazine derivative thatretains full activity. (FIG. 4C) The primordazine derivative coupled tosolid support. (FIG. 4D). A STRING network showing the interactionsbetween DHX9, HNRNPA2B1, HNRNPH1, KHSRP (FUBP2), and TIAL1.

FIG. 5 illustrates evidence of somatic mutation of khsrp and tial1 byTALENs. Pairs of TALENs directed at khsrp and tial1 were injected intosingle cell stage zebrafish embryos. 48 hours later, genomic DNA wasextracted from pools of injected embryos, and the TALEN target siteswere amplified by PCR. PCR products were cloned and sequenced, revealinga variety of insertions and deletions at the target sites (SEQ ID NOS4-10, respectively in order of appearance). TALEN binding sites aremarked in yellow, deleted nucleotides are marked by hyphens, andinserted sequence is marked in blue.

FIGS. 6A-6B illustrate KHSRP knockdown phenocopies treatment withprimordazine. (FIG. 6A) Injection of antisense KHSRP MO causes a loss ofPGCs, as visualized in the vasa:GFP transgenic line. (FIG. 6B)Co-injection of KHSRP MO with the GFP-nanos1 reporter construct causes aloss of GFP expression that mimics treatment with primordazine. Relativefluorescence represents the amount of GFP fluorescence, normalized toGFP RNA. In FIG. 6B, the series from left to right is DMSO,primordazine, and fubp2 MO.

FIG. 7 illustrates the constructs for tissue-specific expression ofbiotin-tagged proteins. For germ cell expression, RNA is transcribed invitro using T7 and co-injected with BirA RNA. The nanos1 3′ UTR (nos 3′)directs expression to germ cells. For neuronal expression, the plasmidis injected along with BirA plasmid. The HuC promoter directspan-neuronal expression. Ubiquitous expression is achieved by injectionof mRNA.

FIG. 8 illustrates examples of compounds used in a chemical screen forPGC small modifiers in zebrafish.

FIG. 9 illustrates that primordazine is effective only around themid-blastula transition.

FIG. 10 illustrates that primordazine affects PGC permanence, notspecification or migration.

FIG. 11 illustrates that nanos loss precedes vasa loss. Based on vasaand nanos1 transcript expression, C6 reduces PGC number after 7 hpf.

FIG. 12 illustrates that primordazine does not cause apoptosis.

FIG. 13 illustrates that primordazine functions through the nanos1 3′UTR.

FIG. 14 illustrates that primordazine acts via a miR-430-independentmechanism. The relative fluorescence intensity is higher for theuntreated sample than the primordazine-treated sample.

FIG. 15 illustrates a schematic representation of experiments conduct toelucidate what bonds to the primordazine response element.

FIG. 16 illustrates what binds to the primordazine response element.

FIG. 17 illustrates mass spectrometry results.

FIG. 18 illustrates KSRP knockdown phenocopies primordazine treatment.In each data plot, the series from left to right is untreated,promordazine, and ksrp MO.

FIG. 19 illustrates KSRP knockdown phenocopies primordazine treatment.

FIG. 20 illustrates a simple SAR from initial screen results.

FIG. 21 illustrates a simple SAR.

FIG. 22 illustrates a network analysis of primordazine and PRE bindingproteins.

FIG. 23 illustrates a model of nanos1 regulation.

FIG. 24 is a set of fluorescent images of zebrafish embryos (48 hpf)injected with 60 pg of synthetic capped RNA eGFP:tnanos 3′UTR (tnanos:from tilapia nanos gene) and trout embryos (30 dpf) injected with 200 pgof synthetic capped RNA eGFP:nanos1 3′UTR (from zebrafish nanos1 gene).Arrows indicate GFP-PGCs in dorsal position relative to the digestivetract (DT) showing auto-fluorescence.

FIG. 25 shows structures of primordazine and related molecules. Numberedovals indicate the three regions that will receive initial focus forstructure-activity relationship studies.

FIG. 26 illustrates that, in addition to regulating the translation ofproteins containing elements from the nanos1 3′ UTR, primordazine blockstranslation of proteins from mRNAs containing the deadend 3′UTR. GFPmessage is tagged with fragments of the deadend 3′UTR, and treatmentwith primordazine blocks the translation of EGFP.

FIG. 27 illustrates that zebrafish embryos treated with primordazineduring early development tend to be males when they become adults. Thepercentage of each sex is represented after treatment with differentdoses of primordazine.

FIG. 28 illustrates that primordazine only blocks translation of mRNAsthat have short polyA tails. EGFP mRNA was fused to 120 bases from thenanos1 3′UTR. Primordazine effectively blocked translation of EGFP inthe absence of polyadenylation, but when the mRNA was polyadenylated invitro prior to injection in to zebrafish, primordazine failed to blocktranslation.

FIG. 29 illustrates that longer polyA tails reduce the efficacy ofprimordazine in blocking translation. PolyA tails of varying length wereadded to the end of an RNA containing the primordazine response element,and the efficacy of primordazine was tested.

FIG. 30 illustrates that proteins which bind the primordazine responseelement (PRE) were identified by quantitative proteomics using zebrafishembryos or human HeLa cells. Some of the binding proteins wereidentified from both cellular sources.

FIG. 31 illustrates that antisense morpholino oligonucleotides were usedto knock down KSRP, TIA1L, or TIAL1 expression in zebrafish. Knockdownof any of the genes caused a reduction in the number of primordial germcells identified in the embryos.

FIG. 32 illustrates that, beyond reducing the number of PGCs (as shownin FIG. 31), knockdown of the genes caused a reduction in thetranslation of PRE-containing transcripts, as quantified usingluciferase constructs tagged with 120 nucleotides from the nanos1 3′UTRor 150 nucleotides from the deadend 3′UTR. For each group of columns inthe plots, the left column represents “−primordazine”, and the rightcolumn represents “+primordazine”.

FIG. 33 illustrates that primordazine inhibits translation ofPRE-containing mRNAs in mammalian cells. GFP mRNA was tagged with 120bases from the nanos1 3′UTR and transfected into various mammalian celllines. The effect of primordazine was determined by western blotting.

FIG. 34 illustrates that primordazine inhibits translation ofPRE-containing mRNAs in mammalian cells. The length of polyA tail wasvaried as indicated (20, 35, or 90 A bases (SEQ ID NOS. 1-3,respectively)).

FIG. 35 is a schematic for immobilizing primordazine on solid supportand purifying primordazine-binding proteins.

FIG. 36 shows potential primordazine binding proteins identified by massspectroscopy.

FIG. 37 is western blot confirmation that dCTPP1 and pgam5 bind toprimordazine.

FIG. 38 is western blot confirmation that dCTPP1 binds to primordazinebeads and can be competed away by primordazine (D9) but not by aninactive derivative.

FIG. 39 shows experimental results after 5 hours old tilapia embryoswere exposed to dilution series of primordazine. At 3 day postfertilization GFP labeled PGCs found at the midline above the intestinewere counted. Between 8 and 11 embryos were analyzed in each treatmentgroup. Standard deviations are shown by vertical bars.

FIG. 40 shows experimental results after Tilapia embryos at the 1 cellstage (2 hpf) and early gastrulation stage were exposure to 20 uM 10 uM5 uM. At 3 day post fertilization PGCs found at the midline trunk regionabove the intestine were counted. A minimum of 10 embryos were analyzedin each treatment and control groups. Standard deviations are shown byvertical bars.

FIGS. 41A-F show that PGC numbers are reduced by treatment withprimordazine in a dose dependent manner. 1 cell stage tilapia embryoprogeny of a transgenic female carrying the Zpc5:eGFP;tnos 3′UTRconstruct and a wild type male were exposed to primordazine. (FIGS.41A-41C) Fluorescent images of sibling 3 day old tilapia embryos,control (FIG. 41A) and exposed to 10 uM (Fig. B) and 20 uM (Fig. C) ofprimordazine. A′-C′) Magnification of the white doted area showing themidline trunk region of each embryo. Untreated control embryos showlarge round shape GFP cells distributed in two rows (A′). Exposure toprimordazine results in a marked reduction in number (B′) or completedisappearance (C′) of GFP labeled cells (arrows). (FIGS. 41D-41E)Fluorescent images of 5 day old embryos control (FIG. 41D), or treatedwith primordazine at hatching water concentration of 10 uM (FIG. 41E)and 20 uM (FIG. 41F).

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is an innovative, simple and generic technologyfor inducing sterility in farmed fish. This technology aims to block themaintenance of primordial germ cells (PGCs) to induce sterility. Thephenotypic result of this technology is a market-sized fish that hasmore muscle (desirable tissue) and less gonad (undesirable tissue). Theinvention also provides fish generated according to methods of theinvention.

The present invention provides a method of producing sterilized fishthat is useful, efficient and cost-effective for sterile fishproduction. The methods are generally applicable to both small scale andlarge scale fish sterilization. The method relates to disruption of germcell development in the fish to be sterilized.

Primordial germ cells (PGCs) are a population of cells in the fishembryo that are precursors to the gametes of the adult fish. The PGCsare produced during the very early stages of embryo development beforeindividual tissues and organs begin to form. At later stages of normalembryo development, as the individual organs are forming, the PGCsmigrate through the embryo from their original location to the area ofthe gonadal precursors. At the end of their migration the PGCs enter thedeveloping gonads and colonize the tissue.

When the embryo eventually undergoes sexual differentiation, the gonadcompletes development to form a testis or ovary in the male or female,respectively, and the PGCs that previously colonized the gonaddifferentiate to produce either spenn or eggs, respectively. This samebasic scenario of gonad formation and germ cell migration anddifferentiation is found in all vertebrates including fish and mammals[Doitsidou M, et al., “Guidance of primordial germ cell migration by thechemokine SDF-1.” Cell 2002; 647-659; Molyneaux K A, et al., “Thechemokine SDF1/CXCL12 and its receptor CXCR4 regulate mouse germ cellmigration and survival.” Development 2003; 130: 4279-4286.].

Described herein is a process for inducing sterility in commerciallyimportant marine species by contacting fish with primordazine or aderivative thereof. In some embodiments, the fish is trout. In someembodiments, the fish is tilapia. In some embodiments, the fish issalmon.

The inventors have shown a clear loss of germ cells in the tilapiaembryos after primordazine treatment (see Example 11). Tilapia is one ofthe most important food fish in the world, second only to carp, andtilapia culture represent one of the fastest growing sectors in theglobal aquaculture industry. However, production is hampered byescalating production costs and regional restrictions in their culture(due to concerns with escapement and environmental impacts onwild/native species). In addition, current tilapia production largelyrelies on costly hormonal sex-reversal practices, using MT(Methyltestosterone) to produce all-male populations. Culture of monosextilapia yields improved growth characteristics, food conversion ratio,and reduces variation in harvest size, sexual territorial behaviour andthe risk of environmental impact from escapes. A process of treatingtilapia embryos with primordazine to ablate PGCs and produce apopulation of sterile and possibly male fish would have great value forthis industry.

In one embodiment, the invention provides a method to efficiently ablatePGCs in large numbers of fish embryos, resulting in large-scaleproduction of reproductively sterile adult fish.

The method of present invention comprises contacting fish withprimordazine or a derivative thereof. Without being bound by theory,primordazine's mechanism of action was traced to a short, 40-nucleotidesequence in the 3′ untranslated region (UTR) of the nanos1 gene. Thissequence, referred to as the primordazine response element (PRE) by theinventors, is sufficient to confer primordazine sensitivity to nanos1 oreven to exogenous genes (e.g. GFP) that are engineered to contain thePRE within their 3′ UTR. Primordazine alters the localization andtranslation of nanos1 RNA in germ cells, and because nanos1 is essentialfor germ cell maintenance (Koprunner, M., Thisse, C., Thisse, B. & Raz,E. A zebrafish nanos-related gene is essential for the development ofprimordial germ cells. Genes Dev 15, 2877-2885 (2001)), primordazineablates PGCs. Without wishing to be bound by theory, because themolecular machinery responsible for germ cell mRNA translation withinPGCs is evolutionarily conserved in heterologous fish species,primordazine or a derivative thereof can be applied to sterilize a broadrange of host target fish species.

As demonstrated by the examples set forth herein, the present inventorshave shown that primordazine blocks expression by altering thelocalization of nanos1 mRNA.

Definitions

For convenience, certain terms employed herein, in the specification,examples and appended claims are collected here. Unless statedotherwise, or implicit from context, the following terms and phrasesinclude the meanings provided below. Unless explicitly stated otherwise,or apparent from context, the terms and phrases below do not exclude themeaning that the term or phrase has acquired in the art to which itpertains. The definitions are provided to aid in describing particularembodiments, and are not intended to limit the claimed invention,because the scope of the invention is limited only by the claims. Unlessotherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein havethe same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in theart to which this invention belongs.

As defined herein, “sterilizing” fish is understood to mean making afish unable to sexually reproduce. Sterile fish are defined as fish thatare unable to reproduce when reaching sexual maturity.

As defined herein, “fish” means any commercially farmed fish species,either freshwater or saltwater species, including, without limitation,gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata), haddock, reedfish (Calamoichthyscalabaricus), sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus), snook (Centropomusundecimalis), black sea bass (Centropristis striata), masu salmon,Atlantic salmon, rainbow trout, monkfish, sole, perch, grouper, catfish,blue gill, yellow perch, white perch, sunfish, tilapia, flounder, mahimahi, striped bass, shad, pike, whitefish, swordfish, red snapper,baramundi, turbot, red drum, as well as ornamental species such aszebrafish.

As defined herein, “functional equivalent” means that the compoundretains some or all of the biological activity of the correspondingcompound.

The term “functional analog,” as used herein means compounds derivedfrom a particular parent compound by straightforward substitutions thatdo not result in a substantial (i.e. more than 100 times) loss in thebiological activity of the parent compound, where such substitutions aremodifications well-known to those skilled in the art.

Certain compounds of the present invention and definitions of specificfunctional groups are also described in more detail below. For purposesof this invention, the chemical elements are identified in accordancewith the Periodic Table of the Elements, CAS version, Handbook ofChemistry and Physics, 75th Ed., inside cover, and specific functionalgroups are generally defined as described therein. Additionally, generalprinciples of organic chemistry, as well as specific functional moietiesand reactivity, are described in Organic Chemistry, Thomas Sorrell,University Science Books, Sausalito: 1999, the entire contents of whichare incorporated herein by reference. Furthermore, it will beappreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art that the syntheticmethods, as described herein, utilize a variety of protecting groups. Bythe term “protecting group,” has used herein, it is meant that aparticular functional moiety, e.g., C, O, S, or N, is temporarilyblocked so that a reaction can be carried out selectively at anotherreactive site in a multifunctional compound. In certain embodiments, aprotecting group reacts selectively in good yield to give a protectedsubstrate that is stable to the projected reactions; the protectinggroup must be selectively removed in good yield by readily available,preferably nontoxic reagents that do not attack the other functionalgroups; the protecting group forms an easily separable derivative (morepreferably without the generation of new stereogenic centers); and theprotecting group has a minimum of additional functionality to avoidfurther sites of reaction. As detailed herein, oxygen, sulfur, nitrogen,and carbon protecting groups may be utilized. Exemplary protectinggroups are detailed herein, however, it will be appreciated that thepresent invention is not intended to be limited to these protectinggroups; rather, a variety of additional equivalent protecting groups canbe readily identified using the above criteria and utilized in themethod of the present invention. Additionally, a variety of protectinggroups are described in Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis, ThirdEd. Greene, T. W. and Wuts, P. G., Eds., John Wiley & Sons, New York:1999, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.Furthermore, a variety of carbon protecting groups are described inMyers, A.; Kung, D. W.; Zhong, B.; Movassaghi, M.; Kwon, S. J. Am. Chem.Soc. 1999, 121, 8401-8402, the entire contents of which are herebyincorporated by reference.

As used herein, the terms “alkyl,” “alkenyl” and the prefix “alk-” areinclusive of both straight chain and branched chain groups and of cyclicgroups, i.e. cycloalkyl and cycloalkenyl. Unless otherwise specified,these groups contain from 1 to 20 carbon atoms, with alkenyl groupscontaining from 2 to 20 carbon atoms. Preferred groups have a total ofup to 10 carbon atoms. Cyclic groups can be monocyclic or polycyclic andpreferably have from 3 to 10 ring carbon atoms. Exemplary cyclic groupsinclude cyclopropyl, cyclopentyl, cyclohexyl, cyclopropylmethyl,adamantly, norbornane, and norbornene. This is also true of groups thatinclude the prefix “alkyl-,” such as alkylcarboxylic acid, alkylalcohol, alkylcarboxylate, alkylaryl, and the like. Examples of suitablealkylcarboxylic acid groups are methylcarboxylic acid, ethylcarboxylicacid, and the like. Examples of suitable alkylacohols are methylalcohol,ethylalcohol, isopropylalcohol, 2-methylpropan-1-ol, and the like.Examples of suitable alkylcarboxylates are methylcarboxylate,ethylcarboxylate, and the like. Examples of suitable alkyl aryl groupsare benzyl, phenylpropyl, and the like.

These may be straight chain or branched, saturated or unsaturatedaliphatic hydrocarbon, which may be optionally inserted with N, O, or S.Representative saturated straight chain alkyls include methyl, ethyl,n-propyl, n-butyl, n-pentyl, n-hexyl, and the like; while saturatedbranched alkyls include isopropyl, sec-butyl, isobutyl, tert-butyl,isopentyl, and the like.

As used herein, the term “alkenyl” means an alkyl, as defined above,containing at least one double bond between adjacent carbon atoms.Alkenyls include both cis and trans isomers. Representative straightchain and branched alkenyls include ethylenyl, propylenyl, 1-butenyl,2-butenyl, isobutylenyl, 1-pentenyl, 2-pentenyl, 3-methyl-1-butenyl,2-methyl-2-butenyl, 2,3-dimethyl-2-butenyl, and the like.

As used herein, the term “alkynyl” means any alkyl or alkenyl, asdefined above, which additionally contains at least one triple bondbetween adjacent carbons. Representative straight chain and branchedalkynyls include acetylenyl, propynyl, 1-butynyl, 2-butynyl, 1-pentynyl,2-pentynyl, 3-methyl-1 butynyl, and the like.

The term “aryl” as used herein includes carbocyclic aromatic rings orring systems. As used herein, the term “aryl” refers to an aromatic 5-8membered monocyclic, 8-12 membered bicyclic, or 11-14 membered tricyclicring system. Examples of aryl groups include phenyl, naphthyl, biphenyl,fluorenyl and indenyl.

The term “heteroaryl” includes aromatic rings or ring systems thatcontain at least one ring hetero atom (e.g., O, S, N). As used herein,the term “heteroaryl” refers to an aromatic 5-8 membered monocyclic,8-12 membered bicyclic, or 11-14 membered tricyclic ring system having1-3 heteroatoms if monocyclic, 1-6 heteroatoms if bicyclic, or 1-9heteroatoms if tricyclic, said heteroatoms selected from O, N, or S(e.g., carbon atoms and 1-3, 1-6, or 1-9 heteroatoms of N, O, or S ifmonocyclic, bicyclic, or tricyclic, respectively), wherein 0, 1, 2, 3,or 4 atoms of each ring may be substituted by a substituent. Examples ofheteroaryl groups include pyridyl, furyl or furanyl, imidazolyl,thiazolyl, benzimidazolyl, pyrimidinyl, thiophenyl or thienyl,quinolinyl, indolyl, oxazolyl, isoquinolinyl, isoindolyl, thiazolyl,pyrrolyl, tetrazolyl, pyrazolyl, oxazolyl, thiazolyl, benzofuranyl,benzothiophenyl, carbazolyl, benzoxazolyl, benzimidazolyl, quinoxalinyl,benzothiazolyl, naphthyridinyl, isoxazolyl, isothiazolyl, purinyl,quinazolinyl, and the like. Heteroaryl rings may also be fused with oneor more cyclic hydrocarbon, heterocyclic, aryl, or heteroaryl rings.Heteroaryl includes, but is not limited to, 5-membered heteroarylshaving one hetero atom (e.g., thiophenes, pyrroles, furans); 5-memberedheteroaryls having two heteroatoms in 1,2 or 1,3 positions (e.g.,oxazoles, pyrazoles, imidazoles, thiazoles, purines); 5-memberedheteroaryls having three heteroatoms (e.g., triazoles, thiadiazoles);5-membered heteroaryls having 3 heteroatoms; 6-membered heteroaryls withone heteroatom (e.g., pyridine, quinoline, isoquinoline, phenanthrine,5,6- cycloheptenopyridine); 6-membered heteroaryls with two heteroatoms(e.g., pyridazines, cinnolines, phthalazines, pyrazines, pyrimidines,quinazolines); 6-membered heretoaryls with three heteroatoms (e.g.,1,3,5-triazine); and 6-membered heteroaryls with four heteroatoms.Particularly preferred heteroaryl groups are 5-10-membered rings with1-3 heteroatoms selected from O, S, and N.

The aryl, and heteroaryl groups can be unsubstituted or substituted byone or more substituents independently selected from the groupconsisting of alkyl, alkoxy, methylenedioxy, ethylenedioxy, alkylthio,haloalkyl, haoalkoxy, haloalkylthio, halogen, nitro, hydroxy, mercapto,cyano, carboxy, formyl, aryl, aryloxy, arylthio, arylalkoxy,arylalkylthio, heteroaryl, heteroaryloxy, heteroarylalkoxy,heteroarylalkylthio, amino, alkylamino, dialkylamino, heterocyclyl,heterocycloalkyl, alkylcarbonyl, alkenylcarbonyl, alkoxycarbonyl,haloalkylcarbonyl, haloalkoxycarbonyl, alkylthiocarbonyl, arylcarbonyl,heteroarylcarbonyl, aryloxycarbonyl, heteroaryloxycarbonyl,arylthiocarbonyl, heteroarylthiocarbonyl, alkanoyloxy, alkanoylthio,alkanoylamino, arylcarbonyloxy, arylcarbonythio, alkylaminosulfonyl,alkyl sulfonyl, aryl sulfonyl, heteroarylsulfonyl, aryldiazinyl,alkylsulfonylamino, arylsulfonylamino, arylalkylsulfonylamino,alkylcarbonylamino, alkenylcarbonylamino, arylcarbonylamino,arylalkylcarbonylamino, arylcarbonylaminoalkyl, heteroarylcarbonylamino,heteroarylalkycarbonylamino, alkylsulfonylamino, alkenylsulfonylamino,arylsulfonylamino, arylalkylsulfonylamino, heteroarylsulfonylamino,heteroarylalkylsulfonylamino, alkylaminocarbonylamino,alkenylaminocarbonylamino, arylaminocarbonylamino,arylalkylaminocarbonylamino, heteroarylaminocarbonylamino,heteroarylalkylaminocarbonylamino and, in the case of heterocyclyl, oxo.If other groups are described as being “substituted” or “optionallysubstituted,” then those groups can also be substituted by one or moreof the above enumerated substituents.

The term “arylalkyl,” as used herein, refers to a group comprising anaryl group attached to the parent molecular moiety through an alkylgroup.

As used herein, the term “cyclyl” refers to a nonaromatic5-8 memberedmonocyclic, 8-12 membered bicyclic, or 11-14 membered tricyclic ringsystem, which can be saturated or partially unsaturated. Representativesaturated cyclyl groups include, but are not limited to, cyclopropyl,cyclobutyl, cyclopentyl, cyclopentenyl, cyclohexyl, cyclohexenyl,cycloheptyl, cyclooctyl, and the like; while unsaturated cyclyl groupsinclude cyclopentenyl and cyclohexenyl, and the like.

The terms “heterocycle”, “heterocyclyl” and “heterocyclic group” arerecognized in the art and refer to nonaromatic 3- to about 14-memberedring structures, such as 3- to about 7-membered rings, whose ringstructures include one to four heteroatoms, 5-8 membered monocyclic,8-12 membered bicyclic, or 11-14 membered tricyclic ring system having1-3 heteroatoms if monocyclic, 1-6 heteroatoms if bicyclic, or 1-9heteroatoms if tricyclic, said heteroatoms selected from O, N, or S(e.g., carbon atoms and 1-3, 1-6, or 1-9 heteroatoms of N, O, or S ifmonocyclic, bicyclic, or tricyclic, respectively), wherein 0, 1, 2 or 3atoms of each ring may be substituted by a substituent. The heterocyclemay include portions which are saturated or unsaturated. In someembodiments, the heterocycle may include two or more rings (e.g.,cycloalkyls, cycloalkenyls, cycloalkynyls, aryls and/or heterocyclyls)in which two or more carbons are common to two adjoining rings, e.g.,the rings are “fused rings.” In some embodiments, the heterocycle may bea “bridged” ring, where rings are joined through non-adjacent atoms,e.g., three or more atoms are common to both rings. Each of the rings ofthe heterocycle may be optionally substituted. Examples of heterocyclylgroups include, for example, thiophene, thianthrene, furan, pyran,isobenzofuran, chromene, xanthene, phenoxathin, pyrrole, imidazole,pyrazole, isothiazole, isoxazole, pyridine, pyrazine, pyrimidine,pyridazine, indolizine, isoindole, indole, indazole, purine,quinolizine, isoquinoline, quinoline, phthalazine, naphthyridine,quinoxaline, quinazoline, cinnoline, pteridine, carbazole, carboline,phenanthridine, acridine, pyrimidine, phenanthroline, phenazine,phenarsazine, phenothiazine, furazan, dioxane, morpholine,tetrahydrofurane, phenoxazine, pyrrolidine, oxolane, thiolane, oxazole,piperidine, piperazine, morpholine, lactones, lactams such asazetidinones and pyrrolidinones, sultams, sultones, and the like. Theheterocyclic ring may be substituted at one or more positions withsubstituents including, for example, halogen, aryl, heteroaryl, alkyl,heteroalkyl, aralkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, cycloalkyl, hydroxyl, amino,nitro, sulfhydryl, imino, amido, phosphonate, phosphinate, carbonyl,carboxyl, silyl, ether, alkylthio, sulfonyl, ketone, aldehyde, ester, aheterocyclyl, an aromatic or heteroaromatic moiety, CF₃, CN, or thelike.

As used herein, the term “halogen” refers to iodine, bromine, chlorine,and fluorine.

As used herein, the terms “optionally substituted alkyl,” “optionallysubstituted cyclyl,” “optionally substituted heterocyclyl,” “optionallysubstituted aryl,” and “optionally substituted heteroaryl” means that,when substituted, at least one hydrogen atom in said alkyl, cyclyl,heterocylcyl, aryl, or heteroaryl is replaced with a substituent. In thecase of an oxo substituent (═O) two hydrogen atoms are replaced. In thisregard, substituents include oxo, halogen, alkyl, cyclyl, heterocyclyl,aryl, heteroaryl, —CN, —OR^(x), —NR^(x)R^(y), —NR^(x)C(═O)R^(y),—NR^(x)SO₂R^(y), —C(═O)R^(x), —C(═O)OR^(x), —C(═O)NR^(x)R^(y),—SO_(n)R^(x) and —SO_(n)NR^(x)R^(y), wherein n is 0, 1 or 2, R^(x) andR^(y) are the same or different and independently hydrogen, alkyl,cyclyl, heterocyclyl, aryl or heterocycle, and each of said alkyl,cyclyl, heterocyclyl, aryl and heterocycle sub stituents may be furthersubstituted with one or more of oxo, halogen, —OH, —CN, alkyl, —OR^(x),heterocycle, —NR^(x)R^(y), —NR^(x)C(═O)R^(y), —NR^(x)SO₂R^(y),—C(═O)R^(x), —C(═O)OR^(x), —C(═O)NR^(x)R^(y), —SO_(n)R^(x) and—SO_(n)NR^(x)R^(y).

The term “carbonyl,” as used herein, refers to “C(═O)”.

The terms “acyl,” “carboxyl group,” or “carbonyl group” are recognizedin the art and can include such moieties as can be represented by thegeneral formula:

wherein W is OR^(w), N(R^(w))₂, SR^(w), or R^(w), R^(w) being hydrogen,alkyl, heteroalkyl, alkenyl, heteroalkenyl, alkynyl, heteroalkynyl,aryl, heteroaryl, heterocycle, substituted derivatives thereof, or asalt thereof. For example, when W is O-alkyl, the formula represents an“ester,” and when W is OH, the formula represents a “carboxylic acid.”When W is alkyl, the formula represents a “ketone” group, and when W ishydrogen, the formula represents an “aldehyde” group. Those of ordinaryskill in the art will understand the use of such terms.

As used herein, the term “substituted” is contemplated to include allpermissible substituents of organic compounds, “permissible” being inthe context of the chemical rules of valence known to those of ordinaryskill in the art. In some cases, “substituted” may generally refer toreplacement of a hydrogen with a substituent as described herein.However, “substituted,” as used herein, does not encompass replacementand/or alteration of a key functional group by which a molecule isidentified, e.g., such that the “substituted” functional group becomes,through substitution, a different functional group. For example, a“substituted phenyl” must still comprise the phenyl moiety and cannot bemodified by substitution, in this definition, to become, e.g., aheteroaryl group such as pyridine. In a broad aspect, the permissiblesubstituents include acyclic and cyclic, branched and unbranched,carbocyclic and heterocyclic, aromatic and nonaromatic, fused, andbridged substituents of organic compounds. Illustrative substituentsinclude, for example, those described herein. The permissiblesubstituents can be one or more and the same or different forappropriate organic compounds. For purposes of this invention, theheteroatoms such as nitrogen may have hydrogen substituents and/or anypermissible substituents of organic compounds described herein whichsatisfy the valencies of the heteroatoms. This invention is not intendedto be limited in any manner by the permissible substituents of organiccompounds.

As used herein, the term “small molecule” refers to a non-peptidic,non-oligomeric organic compound, either synthesized in the laboratory orfound in nature. A small molecule is typically characterized in that itcontains several carbon-carbon bonds, and has a molecular weight of lessthan 2000 g/mol, preferably less than 1500 g/mol, although thischaracterization is not intended to be limiting for the purposes of thepresent invention. Examples of “small molecules” that occur in natureinclude, but are not limited to, taxol, dynemicity and rapamycin,Examples of “small molecules” that are synthesized in the laboratoryinclude, but are not limited to, compounds described in Tan et al.,(“Stereoselective Synthesis of over Two Million Compounds HavingStructural Features Both Reminiscent of Natural Products and Compatiblewith Miniaturized Cell-Based Assays” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 8565;incorporated herein by reference).

The terms “decrease”, “reduced”, “reduction”, “decrease” or “inhibit”are all used herein generally to mean a decrease by a statisticallysignificant amount. However, for avoidance of doubt, “reduced”,“reduction” or “decrease” or “inhibit” means a decrease by at least 10%as compared to a reference level, for example a decrease by at leastabout 20%, or at least about 30%, or at least about 40%, or at leastabout 50%, or at least about 60%, or at least about 70%, or at leastabout 80%, or at least about 90% or up to and including a 100% decrease(e.g. absent level as compared to a reference sample), or any decreasebetween 10-100% as compared to a reference level (e.g., in the absenceof a compound of the invention).

The terms “increased”,“increase” or “enhance” or “activate” are all usedherein to generally mean an increase by a statistically significantamount; for the avoidance of any doubt, the terms “increased”,“increase” or “enhance” or “activate” means an increase of at least 10%as compared to a reference level, for example an increase of at leastabout 20%, or at least about 30%, or at least about 40%, or at leastabout 50%, or at least about 60%, or at least about 70%, or at leastabout 80%, or at least about 90% or up to and including a 100% increaseor any increase between 10-100% as compared to a reference level, or atleast about a 2-fold, or at least about a 3-fold, or at least about a4-fold, or at least about a 5-fold or at least about a 10-fold increase,or any increase between 2-fold and 10-fold or greater as compared to areference level (e.g., in the absence of a compound of the invention).

The term “statistically significant” or “significantly” refers tostatistical significance and generally means at least two standarddeviation (2SD) below normal, or lower, concentration of the marker. Theterm refers to statistical evidence that there is a difference. It isdefined as the probability of making a decision to reject the nullhypothesis when the null hypothesis is actually true. The decision isoften made using the p-value.

The term “substantially” as used herein means a proportion of at leastabout 60%, or preferably at least about 70% or at least about 80%, or atleast about 90%, at least about 95%, at least about 97% or at leastabout 99% or more, or any integer between 70% and 100%.

As used herein the term “comprising” or “comprises” is used in referenceto compositions, methods, and respective component(s) thereof, that areessential to the invention, yet open to the inclusion of unspecifiedelements, whether essential or not.

As used herein the term “consisting essentially of” refers to thoseelements required for a given embodiment. The term permits the presenceof additional elements that do not materially affect the basic and novelor functional characteristic(s) of that embodiment of the invention.

The term “consisting of” refers to compositions, methods, and respectivecomponents thereof as described herein, which are exclusive of anyelement not recited in that description of the embodiment.

As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singularforms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural references unless the contextclearly dictates otherwise. Thus for example, references to “the method”includes one or more methods, and/or steps of the type described hereinand/or which will become apparent to those persons skilled in the artupon reading this disclosure and so forth.

Other than in the operating examples, or where otherwise indicated, allnumbers expressing quantities of ingredients or reaction conditions usedherein should be understood as modified in all instances by the term“about.” The term “about” when used in connection with percentages canmean ±1%.

In this application and the claims, the use of the singular includes theplural unless specifically stated otherwise. In addition, use of “or”means “and/or” unless stated otherwise. Moreover, the use of the term“including”, as well as other forms, such as “includes” and “included”,is not limiting. Also, terms such as “element” or “component” encompassboth elements and components comprising one unit and elements andcomponents that comprise more than one unit unless specifically statedotherwise.

In some embodiments, fish is contacted with a compound of formula (I)

wherein

each R₁, R₂, and R₃ is independently hydrogen; halogen; cyclic oracyclic, substituted or unsubstituted, branched or unbranched aliphatic;cyclic or acyclic, substituted or unsubstituted, branched or unbranchedheteroaliphatic; substituted or unsubstituted, branched or unbranchedacyl; substituted or unsubstituted, branched or unbranched aryl;substituted or unsubstituted, branched or unbranched heteroaryl;—C(═O)R^(B); —CO₂R^(B); —; —CN; —SCN; —SR^(B); —SOR^(B); —SO₂R^(B);—NO₂; —N(R^(B))₂; —NHC(O)R^(B); or —C(R^(B))₃; wherein each occurrenceof R^(B) is independently hydrogen; halogen; a protecting group;aliphatic; heteroaliphatic; acyl; aryl moiety; heteroaryl; hydroxyl;aloxy; aryloxy; alkylthioxy; arylthioxy; amino; alkylamino;dialkylamino; heteroaryloxy; heteroarylthioxy; or alkylhalo;

each R is independently halogen; cyclic or acyclic, substituted orunsubstituted, branched or unbranched aliphatic; cyclic or acyclic,substituted or unsubstituted, branched or unbranched heteroaliphatic;substituted or unsubstituted, branched or unbranched acyl; substitutedor unsubstituted, branched or unbranched aryl; substituted orunsubstituted, branched or unbranched heteroaryl; —C(═O)R^(B);—CO₂R^(B); —; —CN; —SCN; —SR^(B); —SOR^(B); —SO₂R^(B); —NO₂; —N(R^(B))₂;—NHC(O)R^(B); or —C(R^(B))₃; wherein each occurrence of R^(B) isindependently hydrogen; halogen; a protecting group; aliphatic;heteroaliphatic; acyl; aryl moiety; heteroaryl; hydroxyl; aloxy;aryloxy; alkylthioxy; arylthioxy; amino; alkylamino; dialkylamino;heteroaryloxy; heteroarylthioxy; or alkylhalo; and

n is an integer 0 to 4 inclusive;

with the proviso that:

when n is 0, R₁ is ethyl and R₂ is ethyl , then R₃ is not5-methylisoxazol-3-yl;

when n is 0, R₁ is ethyl and R₂ is ethyl, then R₃ is not 1-phenylehtyl;

when n is 0, R₁ is ethyl and R₂ is ethyl, then R₃ is not4-(N-hydroxynitrosyl)phenyl;

when n is 0, R₁ is ethyl and R₂ is H, then R₃ is not4-(N,N-dimethylcarbamoyl)phenyl;

when n is 0, R₁ is ethyl and R₂ is H then R₃ is not 4-carbamoylphenyl atthe same time at the same time; or

when n is 0, R₁ is propyl and R₂ is H, then R₃ is not 1-phenylehtyl.

In some embodiments, R₁ is substituted or unsubstituted, branched orunbranched aliphatic; cyclic or acyclic, substituted or unsubstituted,branched or unbranched heteroaliphatic; substituted or unsubstituted,branched or unbranched acyl.

In some embodiments, R₁ is substituted or unsubstituted, branched orunbranched C₁₋₈ alkyl. In some embodiments, R₁ is substituted orunsubstituted, branched or unbranched C₁₋₄ alkyl. In some embodiments,R₁ is methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, i-propyl, n-butyl, i-butyl, or t-butyl.

In some embodiments, R₁ is R₁-X, wherein X is a linker to a solidsupport.

In some embodiments, R₂ is substituted or unsubstituted, branched orunbranched aliphatic; cyclic or acyclic, substituted or unsubstituted,branched or unbranched heteroaliphatic; substituted or unsubstituted,branched or unbranched acyl.

In some embodiments, R₂ is substituted or unsubstituted, branched orunbranched C₁₋₈ alkyl. In some embodiments, R₂ is substituted orunsubstituted, branched or unbranched C₁₋₄ alkyl. In some embodiments,R₂ is methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, i-propyl, n-butyl, i-butyl, or t-butyl.

In some embodiments, R₃ is cyclic or acyclic, substituted orunsubstituted, branched or unbranched heteroaliphatic; substituted orunsubstituted, branched or unbranched acyl; substituted orunsubstituted, branched or unbranched aryl; substituted orunsubstituted, branched or unbranched heteroaryl.

In some embodiments, R₃ is substituted or unsubstituted aryl. In someembodiments, R₃ is substituted phenyl. In some embodiments, R₃ issubstituted phenyl, wherein the substitution is not p-C(O)N(CH₃)₂ orp-C(O)NH₂.

In some embodiments, R₃ is substituted or unsubstituted alykylaryl. Insome embodiments, R₃ is not CH(CH₃)Ph.

In some embodiments, R₃ is substituted or unsubstituted alkylheteroaryl.

In some embodiments, formula (I) is

In some embodiments, formula (I) is

In some embodiments, formula (I) is

In some embodiments, a compound of formula (I) is attached to a solidsupport. In some embodiments, the solid support is linked to R₁.

In some embodiments, the present invention provides a method of inducingsterility in fish, wherein the sterilization method comprises contactinga fish with a compound of formula (I). In some embodiments, thesterility is complete. In some embodiments, the fertility is decreased.In some embodiments, the sterility is permanent. In some embodiments,the sterility is temporary.

In some embodiments, the present invention provides a method ofproducing a reproductively controllable fish, comprising contacting fishwith a compound of formula (I).

In some embodiments, formula (I) is primordazine or a derivativethereof.

In some embodiments, a fish is contacted with a compound of formula (I)at spaced intervals. In some embodiments, the intervals are hourly. Insome embodiments, the intervals are daily. In some embodiments, theintervals are weekly. In some embodiments, the intervals are bi-weekly.In some embodiments, the intervals are monthly. In some embodiments, theintervals are bi-monthly.

In some embodiments, a fish is contacted with a compound of formula (I)postfertilization. In some embodiments, the contact is between oneminute and one hour postfertilization. In some embodiments, the contactis between one hour and four hour postfertilization. In someembodiments, the contact is between five hours and ten hourspostfertilization. In some embodiments, the contact is between ten hoursand 24 hours postfertilization. In some embodiments, the contact isbetween one day and one week postfertilization. In some embodiments, thecontact is more than one week postfertilization. In some embodiments,the contact is between 1 and 2 months. In some embodiments, the contactis between 2 and 3 months. In some embodiments, the contact is between 3and 4 months. In some embodiments, the contact is between 4 and 5months. In some embodiments, the contact is between 5 and 6 months. Insome embodiments, the contact is more than 6 months.

In some embodiments, the present invention provides a fish obtained by amethod of the invention. In some embodiments, the fish is completelysterile. In some embodiments, the fish fertility is decreased. In someembodiments, the fish is permanently sterile. In some embodiments, thefish is temporarily sterile.

In some embodiments, the present invention further comprises treating afish with at least one other sterilization method. In some embodiments,the other sterilization method is chromosome set manipulation. In someembodiments, the other sterilization method is chromosome setmanipulation inter-hybridization. In some embodiments, the othersterilization method is hybrid production. In some embodiments, theother sterilization method is the disruption of thegonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) pathway.

Another aspect of the invention relates to a method of forcing a fish tobecome male, the method comprising contacting the fish with a compoundof formula (I). In some embodiments, formula (I) is primordazine or aderivative thereof. The inventors have shown that zebrafish embryostreated with primordazine during early development tend to be males whenthey become adults (FIG. 27).

Routes of Administration and Dosage Forms

The compositions according to the present invention may be administeredby any suitable route including injection, implantation, immersing theembryonic or juvenile fish in a bath of an effective substance orthrough a feed product. For example, and not by way of limitation, theactive ingredient may be directly injected intramuscularly into thefish. In one embodiment, the active compound may be combined with apolymer based carrier matrix into a sustained release delivery system.

The term “sustained release” is understood to mean a gradual release ofthe active compound in a controlled manner. A suitable carrier havingsuch sustained release properties may be chosen on the basis of itsgradual release properties in a solution designed to resemble a fish'splasma, such as a ringer solution, other physiological saline solutions,fish serum, etc.

The polymer based carrier matrix may comprise natural or syntheticpolymers or copolymers. Examples of natural polymers are polysaccharidesand various proteins. Synthetic polymers or copolymers may either bebiodegradable, in which case the sustained release is due tobiodegradation, or non degradable, in which case the sustained releaseis due to gradual diffusion of the active compound therefrom. Examplesof biodegradable polymers and copolymers are polylactic polyglycolicacid, polyanhydrides, polyorthoesters and polycaprolactone. Examples ofnon biodegradable polymers are silicone rubber in a mixture with arelatively large amount of a biocompatible protein, a copolymer ofethylene and vinyl acetate, the relative amount of vinyl acetate beingabout 20 50%, and various synthetic polysaccharides. In general, anybiocompatible polymeric controlled release carrier such as thosehitherto used in the art for delivering the compounds of the invention,can in principle be used in accordance with the present invention.

The compositions of the present invention, if delivered in a solid form,can be prepared in any suitable form such as pellets, discs, rods ormicrospheres. These may be administered to the fish larvae either byimplantation of a composition unit (in the form of a pellet, disc orrod) or by injection, either intramuscular, subcutaneous orintraperitoneal (in the form of a suspension of mini-rods ormicro-spheres).

The compositions of the present invention, can be prepared to beincorporated in fish food, such as floating and sinking pellets,granular and flake food.

The size of an implantable composition in accordance with the presentinvention will be determined both by the size of the fish in whichimplantation thereof is intended, i.e. it should not be too big, and bypractical limitations, i.e. the implantable composition should not betoo small so as to render it difficult for manipulation. Thus, forexample, a disc having a diameter of about 1-10 mm and a thickness ofabout 0.012 mm has been found to be suitable for implantation in manyfish such as the sea bream, sea bass and trout.

The composition may be administered to the fish either by subcutaneousor intra-peritoneal implantation (for injectable micro-rods or spheres).For subcutaneous implantation a small incision are made through thefish's skin at a suitable place and after separating the skin from theunderlying muscles, e.g., by the use of forceps, the implantation andincision is made through the skin and muscle of the peritoneal cavityand the implant is inserted through the incision and placed in theperitoneum. The incision in each case is made as small as practicablypossible and there is usually no need for post implantational stitching.

Injectable compositions in accordance with the invention in the form ofmini-rods or microspheres should be sufficiently small to pass through asyringe. Injectable compositions will be suspended in an injectablesolution, such as saline or various buffers, prior to injection andthereafter the suspension is injected into a suitable muscle of the fishor into the peritoneal cavity.

Implantable compositions can comprise about 5-25 uM of the activecompounds per unit. In some embodiments, the compositions comprisesabout 1-100 uM of the active compounds per unit. In some embodiments,the compositions comprises about 1-50 uM of the active compounds perunit. In some embodiments, the compositions comprises about 1-50 uM ofthe active compounds per unit. In some embodiments, the compositionscomprises about 2-40 uM of the active compounds per unit. In someembodiments, the compositions comprises about 3-35 uM of the activecompounds per unit. In some embodiments, the compositions comprisesabout 4-30 uM of the active compounds per unit. In some embodiments, thecompositions comprises about 5-25 uM of the active compounds per unit.In some embodiments, the compositions comprises about 5-10 uM of theactive compounds per unit. In some embodiments, the compositionscomprises about 10-15 uM of the active compounds per unit. In someembodiments, the compositions comprises about 15-20 uM of the activecompounds per unit. In some embodiments, the compositions comprisesabout 20-25 uM of the active compounds per unit. In some embodiments,the compositions comprises about 50-75 uM of the active compounds perunit. In some embodiments, the compositions comprises about 75-100 uM ofthe active compounds per unit. The amount of the active compound may, insome cases, be reduced if a very active analog is utilized.

For embryonic fish or larvae, the compound of the invention can simplybe added to fish feed or water system, either freshwater or saltwater,in various concentrations, as described herein. Additionally, the fishmay be subjected to the compound by “dipping” the fish therein. Thecompound may be fused to a modulator, e.g., organic polycations thatadhere to the skin and gills of the fish, thereby transferring thecompound of the invetion to the fish.

The exposure of the fish to a compound of the invention can includeintermittent (e.g., interrupted) as well as continuous (e.g.,non-interrupted) exposure. The dose of the compound of the inventionthat is effective for sterilization can be routinely determined by aveterinarian, although it may vary depending on the species of fishtreated, and the age of the fish. In some embodiments, the treatment isadministered continuously. In some embodiments, the treatment isadministered once. In some embodiments, the treatment is administereddaily, for a period of 1-7 days. In some embodiments, the treatment isadministered daily, for a period of 7-14 days. In some embodiments, thetreatment is administered daily, for a period of 14-21 days. In someembodiments, the treatment is administered daily, for a period of 21-31days. In some embodiments, the treatment is administered daily, for aperiod of more than 31 days. In some embodiments, the treatment isadministered weekly, for a period of 30-60 days. In some embodiments,the treatment is administered weekly, for a period of 60-90 days. Insome embodiments, the treatment is administered weekly, for a period of90 days or more. In some embodiments, the treatment is administeredweekly, for a period of 1-2 weeks days. In some embodiments, thetreatment is administered weekly, for a period of 2-4 weeks. In someembodiments, the treatment is administered weekly, for a period of morethan 4 weeks.

A treated fish feed may be prepared by incorporating a suitable amountof a compound of the invention into a commercially available fish feedproducts to achieve the desired dosing levels. The amount ofincorporated into the fish feed will depend on the rate at which thefish are fed. For fish fed at the rate of 0.2% to 4% of biomass/day, thetreated feed contains from 0.5 to 500 mg of the compound per kg oftreated feed. In some embodiments, the treated feed contains from 1 to450 mg of the compound per kg of treated feed. In some embodiments, thetreated feed contains from 10 to 400 mg of the compound per kg oftreated feed. In some embodiments, the treated feed contains from 15 to350 mg of the compound per kg of treated feed. In some embodiments, thetreated feed contains from 20 to 300 mg of the compound per kg oftreated feed. In some embodiments, the treated feed contains from 25 to250 mg of the compound per kg of treated feed. In some embodiments, thetreated feed contains from 30 to 200 mg of the compound per kg oftreated feed. In some embodiments, the treated feed contains from 35 to150 mg of the compound per kg of treated feed. In some embodiments, thetreated feed contains from 40 to 100 mg of the compound per kg oftreated feed. In some embodiments, the treated feed contains from 45 to75 mg of the compound per kg of treated feed. In some embodiments, thetreated feed contains from 0.5 to 100 mg of the compound per kg oftreated feed.

Kits

Another aspect of the invention relates to a kit for conveniently andeffectively carrying out the methods in accordance with the presentinvention. In general, the kit comprises one or more containers filledwith one or more of the ingredients of the compositions of theinvention. Optionally associated with such container(s) can be writteninstructions for administering it according to the appropriate dosinglevels and schedule. Additional examples of items contained in the kitinclude, but are not limited to, various containers (e.g., bottles,cartons, blister packs, and ampules) either accompanied by a packageinsert describing the cyclical dosing instructions, or wherein thedosing instructions are printed on, or affixed to the container. Thecompound or its salt may be in the form of a pre-mix, comprising one ormore diluents and 0.01 to 25% by weight of the compounds.

Some embodiments of the invention are listed in the followingparagraphs:

-   1. A method of sterilizing fish comprising: contacting an embryonic    or juvenile fish with a compound of formula (I).-   2. The method of paragraph 1, wherein formula (I) is primordazine.-   3. The method of paragraph 1, wherein the compound is administered    at spaced intervals.-   4. The method of paragraph 1, wherein the compound is administered    daily.-   5. The method of paragraph 1, wherein the compound is administered    weekly.-   6. The method of paragraph 1, wherein the compound is administered    monthly.-   7. The method of paragraph 1, wherein the sterilization is    temporary.-   8. The method of paragraph 1, wherein the sterilization is    permanent.-   9. The method of paragraph 1, wherein contacting is by    administration to the water wherein the fish are swimming.-   10. The method of paragraph 1, wherein contacting is by injection,    implantation, or orally through feed.-   11. The method of paragraph 1, wherein the fish is contacted with    the compound at about 1-5 hours, 10 hours, 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks,    3 weeks, 1 month, 2 month 3 month, or 90 days post fertilization.-   12. The method of paragraph 1, further comprising treating the fish    with at least one other sterilization method.-   13. A fish obtained by the method of any of paragraphs 1-10.

Equivalents

The representative examples which follow are intended to help illustratethe invention, and are not intended to, nor should they be construed to,limit the scope of the invention. Indeed, various modifications of theinvention and many further embodiments thereof, in addition to thoseshown and described herein, will become apparent to those skilled in theart from the full contents of this document, including the exampleswhich follow and the references to the scientific and patent literaturecited herein. It should further be appreciated that, unless otherwiseindicated, the entire contents of each of the references cited hereinare incorporated herein by reference to help illustrate the state of theart. The following examples contain important additional information,exemplification and guidance which can be adapted to the practice ofthis invention in its various embodiments and the equivalents thereof.

These and other aspects of the present invention will be furtherappreciated upon consideration of the following Examples, which areintended to illustrate certain particular embodiments of the inventionbut are not intended to limit its scope, as defined by the claims.

EXAMPLES Example 1 Effects of Primordazine on Protein Localization andInteraction with the PRE Primordazine Ablates PGCs

In an effort to discover pathways essential for PGC maintenance, a smallmolecule screen for compounds that promote disappearance of PGCs wasperformed. The screen was performed with transgenic zebrafish embryosthat express GFP exclusively in PGCs. Of 7,000 small molecules screened,three caused disappearance of PGCs without causing other observablechanges in embryonic development. The three PGC-ablating compounds wereclose structural analogs of each other, and the representative compoundfrom this class was named primordazine (FIG. 1A). Treatment of embryoswith primordazine ablates PGCs in a dose-dependent manner, but only whentreatment begins prior to 4 hours postfertilization. PGC loss wasconfirmed by multiple PGC lineage markers (FIG. 1B).

Primordazine Functions Through a 40-Base Response Element in 3′ UTRs.

During the process of confirming PGC loss in primordazine-treatedembryos, it was discovered that GFP translation was highly sensitive toprimordazine treatment when fused to the 3′ UTR of the nanos1 gene, butnot when fused to other 3′ UTRs. The 3′ UTR of the nanos1 gene wasexamined for elements capable of conferring primordazine sensitivity. Asingle sequence of 40 bases was found to be sufficient to render evenexogenous genes (like GFP) sensitive to primordazine treatment. Thissequence is called the Primordazine Response Element (PRE). As shown inFIG. 2A, translation of GFP RNA injected into zebrafish is blocked byprimordazine when the PRE is placed in its 3′ UTR. When other sequencesfrom the nanos1 3′ UTR are used, primordazine has no effect on GFPexpression.

Primordazine Alters the Localization of Nanos1 mRNA.

Quantitative PCR showed no decrease in nanos1 mRNA levels (not shown).Therefore, mRNA destabilization is not the mechanism by whichprimordazine blocks nanos1 expression. Next, fluorescent in situhybridization and confocal microscopy were used to examine thelocalization of nanos1 mRNA within germ cells. It was found that nanos1mRNA was distributed throughout the cytoplasm in untreated zebrafishgerm cells but became localized to discrete puncta following treatmentwith primordazine (FIG. 3). This observation suggests that primordazineblocks expression by altering the localization of nanos1 mRNA, not bydestabilizing it.

KHSRP and TIAL1 Bind the Primordazine Response Element (PRE)

To ascertain the mechanisms by which the primordazine response element(PRE) controls mRNA localization and expression, a quantitative methodwas sought to discover the proteins that interact with the PRE. Abiotinylated RNA oligomer with the PRE sequence was synthesized and usedas an affinity reagent to purify PRE-binding proteins. Proteomictechniques were used to identify and quantify the binding proteins (Ong,S. E. et al. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture,SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. MolCell Proteomics 1, 376-386 (2002); Ross, P. L. et al. Multiplexedprotein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactiveisobaric tagging reagents. Mol Cell Proteomics 3, 1154-1169 (2004)). Toverify results, experiments were performed both with cultured mammaliancells and with zebrafish embryos. Two distinct proteomic techniques,SILAC and iTRAQ were used to give further confidence to the findings,and two distinct types of controls were used (competition withnon-biotinylated PRE and with irrelevant sequence). Nine proteins wereconsistently found to bind to the PRE and not to irrelevant sequences.Most of these proteins were identified from both mammalian and zebrafishcells, by multiple analytical methods. Of the proteins identified, KHSRPand TIAL1 were focused on for three reasons: 1) They possess known RNAbinding domains, consistent with direct binding to the PRE. 2) Knockdownof KHSRP or TIAL1 ablates PGCs. 3) Both KHSRP and TIAL1 interact withthe RNA helicase DHX9, which were discovered to bind to primordazine(see below).

DHX9 Binds to Primordazine and Interacts with KHSRP and TIAL1.

A primordazine derivative was synthesized in which an 8-atom linker wasappended from the indole nitrogen, terminating in a carboxylic acid(FIG. 4B). This derivative with linker retained full PGC-ablatingactivity in zebrafish embryos, indicating that attachment of the linkerdoes not interfere with the interaction between primordazine and itsbinding partners. The derivatized primordazine was then coupled toAffi-Gel 102 agarose beads, generating an affinity matrix (FIG. 4C). Theaffinity matrix was incubated with whole zebrafish lysates with andwithout competition from free primordazine, and iTRAQ was used toidentify any primordazine-binding proteins. An RNA helicase, DHX9, wasidentified as binding specifically to the affinity matrix, along withtwo RNA-binding adapter proteins HNRNPH1 and HNRNPA2B 1.

Using the STRING protein-protein association database (Szklarczyk, D. etal. The STRING database in 2011: functional interaction networks ofproteins, globally integrated and scored. Nucleic Acids Res 39, D561-568(2011)), network analysis was performed to compare the list ofPRE-binding proteins with the primordazine-binding proteins. It wasfound that DHX9 and the adapter proteins HNRNPH1 and HNRNPA2B 1 areknown to interact with KHSRP and TIAL1 (FIG. 4D). Without wishing to bebound by a theory, it is believed that this finding explains the linkbetween primordazine and the primordazine response element—primordazinebinds DHX9, which binds to KHSRP and TIAL1, which bind to the PRE.Therefore, of the nine PRE-binding proteins, KHSRP and TIAL1 wereprioritized for further investigation in this study because they areessential for PGC maintenance and because they interact with DHX9,HNRNPH1, and HNRNPA2B 1. Further, DHX9 was prioritized as theprimordazine binding protein for this study because the involvement ofan RNA helicase in regulating nanos1 localization and translationappears to be a logical and testable hypothesis. While examples hereinfocus on KHSRP, TIAL1, and DHX9, other proteins can also be used.

Example 2 Determination of the Localization of KHSRP, TIAL1, and DHX9 inGerm Cells +/−Primordazine Treatment

The cDNAs for khsrp, tial1, and dhx9 have been cloned into an expressionvector that allows each protein to be expressed as a GFP fusion in germcells. Germ cell specific expression is achieved by inclusion of themir430 site in the 3′ UTR of each mRNA. RNA encoding individualprotein-GFP fusions is injected into 1-cell stage zebrafish. Thelocalization of the protein-GFP fusion within the germ cells isdetermined by confocal microscopy at 6, 11, and 24 hpf. The effect ofprimordazine on localization is also determined by treating embryos withprimordazine from 2-5 hpf and determining localization at 6, 11, and 24hpf.

In addition to characterizing the localization of the three proteinswithin the germ cells of live zebrafish, localization of the proteinsrelative to nanos1 RNA localization is characterized. For these studies,animals are fixed at 6, 11, and 24 hpf and subjected to fluorescent insitu hybridization of the nanos1 gene. Nanos1 localization is visualizedwith a red marker (see FIG. 3 as an example), and the protein ofinterest is then be stained using anti-GFP immunofluorescence. In thisway, nanos1 RNA localization can be visualized concurrently withlocalization of KHSRP, TIAL1, and DHX9 protein.

KHSRP and TIAL1 exhibit altered localization upon treatment withprimordazine. Because these proteins bind the 3′ UTR of nanos1, andbecause nanos1 localization changes from diffuse to punctate upontreatment with primordazine (see FIG. 3), the localization of KHSRP andTIAL1 also changes from diffuse to punctate. Visualisation ofco-localization of nanos1 mRNA and the proteins of interest isinterpreted as confirming an interaction between KHSRP or TIAL1 and thePRE in vivo. The protein and RNA can be co-localized before primordazinetreatment, after primordazine treatment, or both. Co-localization aftertreatment might suggest that primordazine drives nanos1 RNA intoRNA-protein granules containing KHSRP or TIAL1. Co-localization beforeprimordazine treatment suggests that the proteins protect nanos1 RNAfrom granule incorporation. Co-localization before and afterprimordazine treatment suggests that the proteins are constitutivelyassociated with nanos1 RNA, and that some additional proteinmodification or association regulates the relocalization of both proteinand RNA.

Example 3 Quantify Binding of KHSRP and TIAL1 to the PrimordazineResponse Element In Vitro

Both KHSRP and TIAL1 were identified by mass spectrometry after bindingto a biotinylated PRE oligonucleotide. It is important to verify bindingby an orthogonal technique and to quantify the effect of primordazinetreatment on binding. The protein-GFP fusions described above areexpressed in zebrafish embryos. Embryos are treated with primordazine orDMSO. Embryos are lysed, and biotinylated PRE oligonucleotides are addedto the lysate. Magnetic streptavidin beads can be used to precipitatethe PRE oligo and associated proteins, which are separated by SDS-PAGEand detected by anti-GFP western blot.

Binding of KHSRP and TIAL1 to the PRE is confirmed by western blot.Changes in binding upon treatment with primordazine are detected. Thissupports the fact that KHSRP or TIAL1 is functionally involved in theprimordazine mechanism of action. When neither KHSRP nor TIAL1 exhibitsaltered binding to the PRE with primordazine treatment, it supports thatprimordazine does not alter binding of the proteins to the PRE butrather alters the localization and activity of the proteins inregulating nanos1 translation.

Example 4 Characterize the Effect of Primordazine on DHX9 HelicaseActivity

The RNA helicase DHX9 was found by proteomic analysis to bind to theprimordazine affinity matrix. This finding illustrates that primordazinefunctions by inhibiting the RNA helicase activity of DHX9. In such amodel, DHX9 promotes the translation of nanos1 RNA by unwinding it. Byinhibiting DHX9′s helicase activity, primordazine prevents translationof nanos1 RNA and causes it to become incorporated in translationallyrepressed RNA-protein granules.

The effect of primordazine on DHX9 helicase activity is tested in an invitro assay as previously described (Chakraborty, P. & Grosse, F. HumanDHX9 helicase preferentially unwinds RNA-containing displacement loops(R-loops) and G-quadruplexes. DNA Repair (Amst) 10, 654-665 (2011)).Expression and purification of recombinant DHX9 in High Five cells aredone using the baculovirus system. Double-stranded RNA substrate isgenerated by annealing synthetic RNA oligonucleotides and radiolabeledwith T4 polynucleotide kinase and ³³P-ATP. Helicase assays are performedby combining recombinant DHX9 and substrate +/−primordazine at half-logdilutions in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 3.5 mM MgCl2, 3.5 mM ATP, 0.1 mg/mlBSA, 5mM DTT and 10% (v/v) glycerol and incubating for 20 min at 37° C.Unwinding is terminated by rapid cooling on ice and by the addition ofSDS loading buffer along with a 10-fold molar excess of unlabeledoligonucleotide to prevent reannealing of the unwound RNAs. The reactionproducts are separated by electrophoresis through nondenaturingpolyacrylamide gels at 4 C, and quantified with a PhosphorImager.

Without wishing to be bound by a theory, it is believed that whenprimordazine exhibits dose dependent inhibition of DHX9 helicaseactivity and the IC50 is close to the effective concentration inzebrafish embryos (high nanomolar to low micromolar the primordazineinhibits nanos1 translation by inhibiting DHX9 helicase activity.Alternatively, when no effect of primordazine on DHX9 helicase activityis observed, it is believed that the helicase activity per se is notcentral to primordazine's mechanism of action.

Example 5 Determination of the Functions of KHSRP, TIAL1, and DHX9

Because of their strong and specific association with the primordazineresponse element (PRE), KHSRP and TIAL1 are good candidates formediators of primordazine's effects on germ cells. Indeed, knockdown ofeither gene with morpholino oligonucleotides has a profound effect onPGC maintenance (see FIG. 6 for data for KHSRP). DHX9 is also anintriguing potential mediator of primordazine's effects because it bindsto primordazine and also interacts with KHSRP and TIAL1. Therefore, allthree genes were disrupted to assess the effects on nanos1 localization,translation, and on the maintenance of PGCs. Having developed anefficient pipeline for generating zinc finger nuclease (ZFN)- andTALEN-induced targeted mutations in zebrafish (oley, J. E. et al. Rapidmutation of endogenous zebrafish genes using zinc finger nucleases madeby Oligomerized Pool ENgineering (OPEN). PLoS ONE 4, e4348 (2009);Foley, J. E. et al. Targeted mutagenesis in zebrafish using customizedzinc-finger nucleases. Nat Protoc 4, 1855-1867 (2009); Sander, J. D. etal. Selection-free zinc-finger-nuclease engineering by context-dependentassembly (CoDA). Nat Methods 8, 67-69 (2011); Sander, J. D. et al.Targeted gene disruption in somatic zebrafish cells using engineeredTALENs. Nat Biotechnol 29, 697-698 (2011)), an opportunity exists togenerate true genetic knockouts for these genes. Genetic mutations issupplemented as needed by knockdowns via morpholino oligonucleotides.Knockout (or knockdown) fish are assessed for effects on nanos1localization, translation, and PGC maintenance.

Successful Generation of Targeted Mutations in Zebrafish Using ZincFinger Nucleases and TALENs.

Until recently, targeted mutation of genes in zebrafish was notpossible. Recent demonstrations that zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) andtranscription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) can efficientlyinduce targeted mutations in zebrafish have opened up new experimentalpossibilities for the organism (Sander, J. D. et al. Targeted genedisruption in somatic zebrafish cells using engineered TALENs. NatBiotechnol 29, 697-698 (2011); Meng, X., Noyes, M. B., Zhu, L. J.,Lawson, N. D. & Wolfe, S. A. Targeted gene inactivation in zebrafishusing engineered zinc-finger nucleases. Nat Biotechnol 26, 695-701(2008); Doyon, Y. et al. Heritable targeted gene disruption in zebrafishusing designed zinc-finger nucleases. Nat Biotechnol 26, 702-708(2008).) New technologies for targeted manipulation of the zebrafishgenome have been developed (Foley, J. E. et al. Rapid mutation ofendogenous zebrafish genes using zinc finger nucleases made byOligomerized Pool ENgineering (OPEN). PLoS ONE 4, e4348 (2009); Foley,J. E. et al. Targeted mutagenesis in zebrafish using customizedzinc-finger nucleases. Nat Protoc 4, 1855-1867 (2009); Sander, J. D. etal. Selection-free zinc-finger-nuclease engineering by context-dependentassembly (CoDA). Nat Methods 8, 67-69 (2011)). Using these technologies,targeted mutations in more than 30 zebrafish genes were created duringthe past 3+ years.

Mutation of khsrp, tiall, and dhx9.

Pairs of TALENs targeting khsrp and tial1 were designed and assembled.These TALEN pairs were injected into one-cell stage zebrafish embryos,and their efficiency was determined by assessing the somatic mutationrate in the embryos after 48 hours of development. For khsrp, thesomatic mutation rate was approximately 4% (1/26 sequences analyzed),and for tial1, the somatic mutation rate was approximately 76% (29/38sequences analyzed, see FIG. 5). Therefore, both TALEN pairs were activeand capable of generating mutations at an acceptable rate. Based onthese results, one can successfully identify mutant founders for khsrpand tial1. Accordingly, injected animals can be raised to sexualmaturity and are screened for founder identification. A similar processwas followed for dhx9 as described below.

khsrp Knockdown Phenocopies Treatment with Primordazine.

While generating mutations in khsrp, tial1, and dhx9 genes, whichrequired several months of work, khsrp and tial1 were tested by a morerapid, parallel approach. Morpholino oligonucleotides (MOs) were used toknock down expression of khsrp in zebrafish. It was found thatkhsrp-MO-injected zebrafish exhibited a reduction in PGCs (FIG. 6A). Ina quantitative assay, khsrp MO or a control MO with mRNA encoding GFPwere co-injected followed by the nanos1 3′ UTR. It was found thatknockdown of khsrp stabilized GFP RNA while simultaneously reducingtranslation of GFP protein. This effect was indistinguishable from theeffect of primordazine treatment (FIG. 6B). This shows that KHSRP playsa role in PGC maintenance while regulating mRNA translation through thenanos1 3′ UTR. It was also found that knockdown of TIAL1 caused a lossof PGCs (data not shown).

Example 6 Complete Targeted Mutation of khsrp, tial1, and dhx9

An efficient pipeline for creating targeted mutations was established.In brief, the process includes:

1) TALEN design. TALEN pairs are designed using ZiFiT 4.0 software(http://zifit.partners.org/ZiFiTBeta/Introduction.aspx). The first exonin each gene is targeted, maximizing the possibility that mutationsgenerated are null.

2) TALEN construction. TALENs are constructed using the FLASH method aspreviously described²².

3) mRNA synthesis. This is performed using standard mMESSAGE RNAsynthesis kits.

4) mRNA injection. Performed at the one-cell stage with an Eppendorfmicroinjector.

5) determination of somatic mutation rate. Injected embryos are pooled,genomic DNA is collected, and the target site is amplified by PCR andTOPO cloned. 96 individual clones are sequenced.

6) founder identification. Injected animals are grown to maturity andout-crossed. Offspring are genotyped for the presence of mutations atthe target site.

The success rate with TALENs has been 100% so far. Targeted mutations inall 13 genes that were targeted with TALENs were generated, although insome cases a second pair of TALENs was designed to a particular gene toachieve successful mutation. Founders for all three genes targeted wereidentified. For genes that fail to be mutated on the first attempt, itis necessary to design a second pair of TALENs at a different site, butmutations are usually to be generated on the first or second attempt.

Example 7 Test Mutants for Defects in RNA Localization, Translation, andPGC Maintenance

Once the function of a protein has been disrupted, the effect ofdisruption on nanos1 RNA localization, translation of a GFP reporter,and maintenance of PGCs was determined. Both homozygous mutants and theoffspring of homozygous mothers are tested, since maternal effects arealso possible.

nanos1 mRNA localization is tested by fluorescent in situ hybridizationusing the method shown in FIG. 3 and previously published (Machluf, Y. &Levkowitz, G. Visualization of mRNA expression in the zebrafish embryo.Methods Mol Biol 714, 83-102 (2011)). Both untreated andprimordazine-treated mutant animals are stained for endogenous nanos1expression pattern in primordial germ cells at 6, 11, and 24 hourspostfertilization (hpf). Expression patterns are determined by confocalmicroscopy using Zeiss LSM700. In untreated mutants, a change relativeto the diffuse, wild-type expression pattern was of particular interest(FIG. 3). In primordazine-treated mutants, a change relative to thepunctate pattern seen in wild-type, primordazine-treated animals was ofparticular interest (FIG. 3).

mRNA translation is tested using the same GFP reporter depicted in FIG.2. This reporter consists of GFP mRNA fused to the nanos1 3′ UTR with amutant miR-430 site. When injected into one-cell stage zebrafish, GFP isexpressed in both germ and somatic cells (Giraldez, A. J. et al.Zebrafish MiR-430 promotes deadenylation and clearance of maternalmRNAs. Science 312, 75-79 (2006); Mishima, Y. et al. Differentialregulation of germline mRNAs in soma and germ cells by zebrafishmiR-430. Curr Biol 16, 2135-2142 (2006)). Primordazine stabilizes themRNA but prevents its translation. As such, the quantity of mRNA isincreased as detected by qPCR, but the quantity of GFP proteindiminishes, as determined by quantitative fluorescence microscopy (seeFIG. 2 for an example). Mutant animals were injected with the GFPreporter mRNA and quantify the amount of mRNA and protein present at 11and 24 hours. Attention was paid to the effects of the mutations onbaseline translation of GFP and also for effects of the mutations onresponsiveness to primordazine.

PGC maintenance is determined by performing in situ hybridizations withPGC markers vasa, nanos1, and deadend in wild-type and mutant animals at24 hours postfertilization. Experiments are performed as shown in FIGS.1A-1B and published previously (Machluf, Y. & Levkowitz, G.Visualization of mRNA expression in the zebrafish embryo. Methods MolBiol 714, 83-102 (2011). A decrease in PGC numbers in mutant animals wasof particular interest. It was also determined if the mutation preventsprimordazine from ablating PGCs.

Disruption of KHSRP, TIAL1, and DHX9 alters nanos1 mRNA localization,translation, or PGC maintenance. Changes in baseline localization,translation, or PGC number, illustrate that the proteins are involved innormal PGC development and maintenance. Changes in the ability ofprimordazine to ablate PGCs without affecting baseline levels,illustrate that the protein is involved in primordazine's mechanism ofaction but may not contribute to normal PGC biology. Changes in bothbaseline and primordazine-induced states, illustrate involvement of theprotein in both normal and primordazine-induced functions.

Example 8 Discovery of Additional RNAs Regulated by Primordazine

Preliminary evidence suggests that the mechanisms that regulate nanos1localization and translation are not restricted to nanos1. It is known,for example, that the mechanisms are active in most cells, not just germcells. When the miR-430 site is mutated in the nanos1 3′ UTR, itsaccompanying message is translated throughout all somatic cells, andprimordazine can block translation in these somatic cells. Hence, theregulatory machinery is present in cells beyond germ cells and isregulating other RNAs, in addition to nanos1. Other RNAs regulated byprimordazine were sought.

Germ cells are an obvious place to look for RNAs that are regulated at apost-transcriptional level because much of the early germ cell biologyoccurs before the onset of zygotic transcription. Neurons are anotherinteresting cell type in which to look for post-transcriptionalregulation of RNAs. Many neurons possess multiple axons and dendrites,and there is evidence that a single neuron can selectively controlprotein translation at different synapses by regulating the localizationand translation of RNAs at specific axons (Holt, C. E. & Bullock, S. L.Subcellular mRNA localization in animal cells and why it matters.Science 326, 1212-1216 (2009); Swanger, S. A. & Bassell, G. J. Makingand breaking synapses through local mRNA regulation. Curr Opin Genet Dev(2011); Loya, C. M., Van Vactor, D. & Fulga, T. A. Understandingneuronal connectivity through the post-transcriptional toolkit. GenesDev 24, 625-635 (2010).). This capability appears to be central to thefunction of neurons, and it is interesting to note that many of thegenetic mutations that have been associated with neurodegenerative andother nervous system disorders lie in RNA binding proteins (Orr, H. T.RNA gains a new function: a mediator of neurodegeneration. TrendsNeurosci 27, 233-234 (2004); Ticozzi, N., Ratti, A. & Silani, V. Proteinaggregation and defective RNA metabolism as mechanisms for motor neurondamage. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets 9, 285-296 (2010);Lagier-Tourenne, C., Polymenidou, M. & Cleveland, D. W. TDP-43 andFUS/TLS: emerging roles in RNA processing and neurodegeneration. Hum MolGenet 19, R46-64 (2010)). Therefore, in addition to identifying RNAsthat are regulated by primordazine in germ cells, it was investigated todetermine if RNAs are similarly regulated in neurons.

Two complementary experimental approaches are used to identifying RNAsthat are regulated by primordazine. The first uses RNA sequencing(RNA-seq) to examine the set of RNAs that is being actively translated(present in polysomes) with and without primordazine treatment. Thisexperiment has the potential to find all RNAs that are regulated at thetranslational level by primordazine-sensitive pathways. The secondapproach uses in vivo biotinylation to purify KHSRP and TIAL1 along withtheir associated RNAs. Again, RNA-seq can identify individual RNAs andquantify the effects of primordazine treatment.

Purify Polysomes and Quantify Changes in Actively Translated mRNA by RNASequencing.

Association of an mRNA with ribosomal polysomes is generally viewed asan indicator that the mRNA is being actively translated. Therefore,there is a subset of mRNAs whose interaction with polysomes is alteredby primordazine treatment. To identify this subset of mRNAs, polysomeswere purify from untreated and primordazine-treated zebrafish andcompare the associated mRNAs by RNA-seq. This experiment is done asfollows:

1) mass matings. Large-scale matings of wild-type zebrafishgenerate >10,000 synchronized zebrafish embryos.

2) primordazine treatment. Half of the embryos are treated withprimordazine from 2-6 hpf; the other half are treated with DMSO.

3) deyolking. At 6 hours postfertilization, embryos are crushed bygentle pressure with mortar and pestle in Ringer's buffer on ice. Cellsare rinsed and pelleted several times to remove yolk and chorions.

4) cell lysis. Cells are lysed in Triton-X buffer containingcycloheximide, protease and phosphatase inhibitors as described (Masek,T., Valasek, L. & Pospisek, M. Polysome analysis and RNA purificationfrom sucrose gradients. Methods Mol Biol 703, 293-309 (2011); Melamed,D. & Arava, Y. Genome-wide analysis of mRNA polysomal profiles withspotted DNA microarrays. Methods Enzymol 431, 177-201 (2007)). Lysatesare clarified by centrifugation.

5) polysome purification and RNA extraction. Polysomes are purified byultracentrifugation on a sucrose gradient as described (Masek, T.,Valasek, L. & Pospisek, M. Polysome analysis and RNA purification fromsucrose gradients. Methods Mol Biol 703, 293-309 (2011). Melamed, D. &Arava, Y. Genome-wide analysis of mRNA polysomal profiles with spottedDNA microarrays. Methods Enzymol 431, 177-201 (2007)). RNA is extractedfrom polysome preps using the Trizol method.

6) library construction, sequencing, and analysis. The dUTP method isused for strand-specific RNA sequencing (Parkhomchuk, D. et al.Transcriptome analysis by strand-specific sequencing of complementaryDNA. Nucleic Acids Res 37, e123 (2009)). This method is preferred by theBroad Institute Genome Sequencing Platform, where the RNA-seq isperformed, because comparison of the seven leading RNA-seq methodsshowed that the dUTP method performs best as measured by strandspecificity, library complexity, and continuity and evenness of coverage(Levin, J. Z. et al. Comprehensive comparative analysis ofstrand-specific RNA sequencing methods. Nat Methods 7, 709-715 (2010)).The method is also performed as previously described (Parkhomchuk, D. etal. Transcriptome analysis by strand-specific sequencing ofcomplementary DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 37, e123 (2009); Levin, J. Z. etal. Comprehensive comparative analysis of strand-specific RNA sequencingmethods. Nat Methods 7, 709-715 (2010)). Briefly, RNA is fragmented byheating in sodium citrate solution. 200 ng of RNA is primed with randomhexamers and first strand synthesis is performed with SuperScript III,SUPERase-In, and actinomycin D. First strand is cleaned up byextraction/precipitation, followed by second strand synthesis with dTTPreplaced by dUTP. Paired-end libraries are prepared for Illuminasequencing according to manufacturer instructions. Sequencing isperformed on an Illumina Genome Analyzer II, with standard sequencingprimers and 76 base reads. Data analysis is performed using Trinity, asuite of RNA-seq analysis tools developed by the Broad Institute GenomeSequencing Platform (Grabherr, M. G. et al. Full-length transcriptomeassembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol(2011)).

The majority of mRNAs is not affected by primordazine treatment and istherefore equally represented in polysome fractions from untreated andprimordazine-treated embryos. Primordazine-treated animals have fewovert developmental defects outside the germline, suggesting thatprimordazine does not cause general translation blockade. Therefore,housekeeping genes and other genes not regulated by primordazine arefound equally in polysomes from untreated and primordazine-treatedanimals. In contrast, nanos1 mRNA is changed in its localization andtranslation by primordazine treatment and therefore is present at higherlevels in untreated polysomes than in primordazine-treated polysomes.Most importantly, a subset of mRNAs was identify that, like nanos1, arealtered in their translation by primordazine treatment. These mRNAs areover- or under-represented in primordazine-treated polysomes.

Purify KHSRP and TIAL1 and Identify the Associated RNAs.

It is known from proteomic experiments that KHSRP and TIAL1 bind to thenanos1 primordazine response element and not to the control sequencesthat have been tested. It is desirable to know what other RNAs, beyondnanos1, are bound specifically by these proteins. To identify associatedRNAs, an in vivo biotinylation technique was used to selectivelybiotinylate KHSRP and TIAL1 in germ cells and neurons. Streptavidinbeads are then used to purify each protein and its associated RNAs fromthe tissue of interest. RNAs are be identified by RNA-seq.

The technique employs a bacterial biotin-protein ligase called BirA tobiotinylate the target protein in vivo (Cull, M. G. & Schatz, P. J.Biotinylation of proteins in vivo and in vitro using small peptide tags.Methods Enzymol 326, 430-440 (2000); de Boer, E. et al. Efficientbiotinylation and single-step purification of tagged transcriptionfactors in mammalian cells and transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA100, 7480-7485 (2003)). BirA recognizes and specifically biotinylates a15 amino acid biotinylation tag. Each protein are subcloned into anexpression vector that enables tissue-specific expression of the proteinfused to a 15 amino acid biotinylation tag (see FIG. 7). Co-expressionwith BirA results in in vivo biotinylation of the protein (Cull, M. G. &Schatz, P. J. Biotinylation of proteins in vivo and in vitro using smallpeptide tags. Methods Enzymol 326, 430-440 (2000); de Boer, E. et al.Efficient biotinylation and single-step purification of taggedtranscription factors in mammalian cells and transgenic mice. Proc NatlAcad Sci USA 100, 7480-7485 (2003)). Once biotinylated, the protein arepurified with high efficiency and specificity using streptavidin beads.

The two proteins (KHSRP and TIAL1) are purified from three differentcell populations (PGCs, neurons, and all cells), for a total of 6different experiments. For each experiment, untreated andprimordazine-treated embryos are compared. Neuronal expressions aredriven from the HuC promoter (Park, H. C. et al. Analysis of upstreamelements in the HuC promoter leads to the establishment of transgeniczebrafish with fluorescent neurons. Dev Biol 227, 279-293 (2000)), andgerm cell-restricted expression are achieved using the nanos1 3′ UTR(Mishima, Y. et al. Differential regulation of germline mRNAs in somaand germ cells by zebrafish miR-430. Curr Biol 16, 2135-2142 (2006)),and ubiquitous expression are achieved by injecting mRNA.

There are several advantages to this approach. First, the use ofbiotin-streptavidin for protein purification is efficient, specific, andreproducible, eliminating the artifacts that are common for mostantibodies. Second, by expressing the biotinylated proteins in atissue-specific manner, the associated RNAs that are unique to that celltype can be identified.

The experiment proceeds as follows:

1) tissue-specific expression of tagged proteins. DNA (for neuronalexpression) or RNA (for germ cell expression or ubiquitous expression)encoding each tagged protein is injected into 1000 wild-type embryosalong with DNA or RNA encoding BirA.

2) primordazine treatment. For germ cell experiments, half of theembryos are treated with primordazine from 2-6 hpf; the other half aretreated with DMSO. For neuronal and ubiquitous expression experiments,embryos are treated from 24-28 hpf.

3) deyolking. At 6 hours postfertilization (for germ cell experiments)or 28 hpf (for neuron and ubiquitous experiments), embryos are crushedby gentle pressure with mortar and pestle in Ringer's buffer on ice.Trypsin is added as needed for 28 hpf animals. Cells are rinsed andpelleted several times to remove yolk and chorions, then filteredthrough a 40 micron mesh.

4) cell lysis. Cells are lysed in Triton-X buffer containing proteaseand phosphatase inhibitors. Lysates are clarified by centrifugation.

5) protein purification and RNA extraction. Target proteins are purifiedusing magnetic streptavidin beads. RNA is extracted from the protein-RNAcomplexes using the Trizol method.

6) library construction, sequencing, and analysis. Library construction,sequencing, and analysis proceed as described above except thatbarcoding is used to enable multiplexing of samples to reduce the numberof lanes required for sequencing.

The experiments outlined above provide a vast and rich source of datathat can be mined in several ways. The data enable us to gain thefollowing kinds of insights:

Sequence selectivity. By comparing all of the RNA sequences bound to aparticular protein, the sequence preference of that protein can beascertained.

Primordazine selectivity. By comparing treated and untreated embryos, itcan be determined if primordazine's effects are selective for nanos1 oraffect other pathways.

Tissue selectivity. By comparing RNAs from germ cells, neurons, and allcells, it can be determined if primordazine-sensitive mechanisms areactive in cells outside of the germline.

Selectivity overlap. By comparing RNAs associated with KHSRP and TIAL1,it can be determined the extent to which the two proteins haveoverlapping and distinct functions.

Example 9 nanos 3′ UTR can Target PFCs Specific Expression inHeterologous Species

Synthetic capped eGFP:nanos1 3′UTR mRNA was microinjected into bothtrout and salmon embryos and eGFP:tnanos 3′UTR mRNA (tnanos 3′UTR fromtilapia nanos gene) into zebrafish embryos and observed GFP expressionexclusively in PGCs of RNA treated fish (FIG. 24). This result mirrorsother studies addressing the relationship between phylogenetic distanceand functionality of the 3′UTR of germ cell specific genes. For example,the 3′UTR of zebrafish nos1 gene also directed PGC GFP expression inherring, medaka and ice goby, which belong to Clupeinformes,Beloniformes, and Perciformes respectively (Saito et al., TheInternational Journal of Developmental Biology 2006, 50, 691). Theevolutionarily conserved nature of the machinery responsible for germcell mRNA translation within PGCs makes this PRE pathway particularlyattractive for the development of inhibitors, and should allowapplication of primordazine to a broad range of host target species.

Example 10 Optimization of Primordazine Derivatives and Mode of Actionof Primordazine

Primordazine ablates germ cells in a dose-dependent manner, with maximalefficacy achieved at egg water concentrations of 6 uM. Although thisdose is reasonably low for an un-optimized screening hit, there arereasons to believe that more potent derivatives of primordazine can bedeveloped. Typically, primary hits from small molecule screens can beoptimized by medicinal chemistry to be orders of magnitude more potentand selective. For example, using medicinal chemistry, derivatives ofdorsomorphin exhibiting high potency (IC50=5 nM) were previouslydeveloped with dramatically improved selectivity (Cuny et al., BioorgMed Chem Lett 2008, 18, 4388-4392; Yu et al., Nat Chem Biol 2008, 4,33-41). In the case of primordazine, developing derivatives withimproved potency and selectivity can provide many practical benefits,such as limiting the amount of compound required to ablate germ cellsand minimizing unwanted effects of the compound on the developing fish.Therefore, it is desirable to identify primordazine derivatives thatablate germs cells at concentrations 10-100 times lower than thoserequired for primordazine.

The process of medicinal chemistry optimization goes beyond trial anderror to ask specific questions about the relationship between acompound's structural features and its activity. Working in iterativecycles, specific structural features of primordazine can be interrogatedby designing, acquiring, and testing small groups of compounds thatincorporate chemical modifications to that feature. The effects of thosechanges can point to further modifications that should be investigated,leading to another cycle of design, acquisition, and testing. The finaloutcome, after several cycles of investigation, is typically a group ofhighly optimized compounds with the desired characteristics. Althoughthere are multiple compound attributes that one might wish toincorporate into the final optimized structures (e.g. low toxicity),potency should be focused on at the beginning. Each derivative designedand acquired can be tested for its effect on PGCs, as described below.As potency is optimized, toxicity is another concern. Compounds thatablate PGCs but also have low toxicity even at elevated doses are givenpreference. Optimization can proceed through iterative rounds ofcompound design, acquisition, and testing as follows:

(1). Compound design. Early rounds of compound design should focus onthree distinct regions that emanate from the central triazinoindolpharmacophore of the primordazine structure: (1) the acetylphenyl ring,(2) the thioacetamide, and (3) the ethyl group pendant to the indolenitrogen. These regions are highlighted on the primordazine structureand indicated as R1, R2, and R3 respectively (See FIG. 25). PreliminaryResults suggest that Region 1 is relatively tolerant of modifications,accepting changes to methylfuran or chlorophenyl groups (see FIG. 25).The flexibility afforded by this region provides an opportunity to makefairly major modifications in an effort to alter potency andselectivity. Chemical space can be explored fairly broadly when makingmodifications to this region. A search of commercially availablecompounds has identified more than 300 compounds that preserve thecentral primordazine pharmacophore but vary Region 1. Examples ofmoieties that can be tested at R1 include ethane, ethanol, isopropane,piperidine, piperazine, morpholine, thiadiazole, benzothiazole,thiazole, phenothiazine, aminosulfone, pyridine, isoxazole, carboxylate,naphthalene, etc. Region 2 is not as synthetically accessible as Region1, and fewer commercial compounds are available with variation at R2.Nevertheless, preliminary results (see FIG. 25) suggest that Region 2can tolerate some modification, including —H and —C2H5 at R2. A fewadditional modifications at this position can be explored, including—CH3, -isopropyl, and -benzyl. Region 3 appears to be relativelyaccessible synthetically, and numerous modifications at R3 arecommercially available, including methyl, ethyl, propyl, isopropyl,butyl, allyl, benzyl, phenylethyl, and acetic acid derivatives.

Each region can be modified individually, for example by making changesin region 1 while keeping regions 2 and 3 constant. Beneficialmodifications from multiple regions are then be combined with theexpectation of identifying additive or synergistic effects. In additionto modifying the pendant groups at R1, R2, and R3, the effects ofmodifying the central pharmacophore itself can be explored, for exampleby moving or removing ring nitrogens and by modifying the thioether andamide linkages.

(2). Compound acquisition. Where possible, compounds are acquired bypurchase rather than synthesis. Chemoinformatic programs such asChemNavigator (www.chemnavigator.com) and ChemFinder(www.chemfinder.com) can be used to identify commercially availablecompounds and building blocks. An initial analysis suggests that thereare hundreds of commercially available compounds related in structure toprimordazine. Where compounds are not commercially available, they canbe synthetically accessible in few steps.

(3). Compound potency testing. Optimization is driven primarily bypotency, meaning that each compound acquired is tested for potency, andpotency changes influence subsequent rounds of compound design. Fortesting compounds, 3-5 transgenic zebrafish embryos (expressing GFP fromthe vasa promoter) are placed in each well of clear-bottom, black-wall96 well plates. Embryos are treated with DMSO or varying doses of acompound in two-fold dilutions from 8 uM to 16 nM, beginning at 2 hpostfertilization. At 24 h, the plate is loaded onto the screeningmicroscope, which systematically scans wells and captures fluorescentimages of fish in each well. The efficacy of each compound dose inablating PGCs is recorded, yielding an EC50 for each compound.

Biochemical and proteomic experiments can elucidate the targets andmechanisms of action of primordazine, shedding further light on thebiological pathways regulating germ cell development and fertility.

Primordazine appears to function by a novel mechanism to ablate PGCs.Elucidating this mechanism can provide important new insights into PGCbiology and may uncover new targets and techniques for manipulating fishfertility. Some of the details of primordazine's mechanism were alreadyuncovered. For example, it was identified a novel response element inthe nanos1 3′ UTR regulates the translation of this master germ cellregulator. Two proteins, FUBP2 and TIAL1, that bind to the primordazineresponse element were identified and were found to be necessary for germcell maintenance (see FIG. 6).

Purify polysomes and quantify changes in actively translated mRNA by RNAsequencing. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) is used to examine the set of RNAsthat is being actively translated (present in polysomes) with andwithout primordazine treatment. This experiment has the potential tofind all RNAs that are regulated at the translational level byprimordazine-sensitive pathways. Without wishing to be bound by theory,association of an mRNA with ribosomal polysomes is generally viewed asan indicator that the mRNA is being actively translated. Therefore,there can exist a subset of mRNAs whose interaction with polysomes isaltered by primordazine treatment. To identify this subset of mRNAs,polysomes are purified from untreated and primordazine-treated zebrafishand compare the associated mRNAs by RNA-seq. This experiment can beperformed as follows:

(1) mass matings. Large-scale matings of wild-type zebrafishgenerate >10,000 synchronized zebrafish embryos.

(2) primordazine treatment. Half of the embryos are treated withprimordazine from 2-6 hpf; the other half are treated with DMSO.

(3) deyolking. At 6 hours postfertilization, embryos are crushed bygentle pressure with mortar and pestle in Ringer's buffer on ice. Cellsare rinsed and pelleted several times to remove yolk and chorions.

(4) cell lysis. Cells are lysed in Triton-X buffer containingcycloheximide, protease and phosphatase inhibitors as described (Maseket al., Methods Mol. Biol. 2011, 703, 293-309; Melamed and Arava,Methods Enzymol. 2007, 431, 177-201). Lysates are clarified bycentrifugation.

(5) polysome purification and RNA extraction. Polysomes are purified byultracentrifugation on a sucrose gradient as described (Masek et al.,Methods Mol. Biol. 2011, 703, 293-309; Melamed and Arava, MethodsEnzymol. 2007, 431, 177-201). RNA is extracted from polysome preps usingthe Trizol method.

(6) library construction, sequencing, and analysis. The dUTP method isused for strand-specific RNA sequencing (Parkhomchuk et al., NucleicAcids Res. 2009, 37, e123). This method is preferred by the BroadInstitute Genome Sequencing Platform, because comparison of the sevenleading RNA-seq methods showed that the dUTP method performs best asmeasured by strand specificity, library complexity, and continuity andevenness of coverage (Levin et al. Nat Methods 2010, 7, 709-715).Briefly, RNA is fragmented by heating in sodium citrate solution. 200 ngof RNA is primed with random hexamers and first strand synthesis isperformed with SuperScript III, SUPERase-In, and actinomycin D. Firststrand is cleaned up by extraction/precipitation, followed by secondstrand synthesis with dTTP replaced by dUTP. Paired-end libraries areprepared for Illumina sequencing according to manufacturer instructions.Sequencing is performed on an Illumina Genome Analyzer II, with standardsequencing primers and 76 base reads. Data analysis is performed usingTrinity, a suite of RNA-seq analysis tools developed by the BroadInstitute Genome Sequencing Platform (Grabherr et al., Nat Biotechnol2011).

The majority of mRNAs should not be affected by primordazine treatmentand should therefore be equally represented in polysome fractions fromuntreated and primordazine-treated embryos. This is based on theobservation that primordazine-treated animals have few overtdevelopmental defects outside the germline, suggesting that primordazinedoes not cause general translation blockade. Therefore, housekeepinggenes and other genes not regulated by primordazine should be foundequally in polysomes from untreated and primordazine-treated animals. Incontrast, nanos1 mRNA should be changed in its localization andtranslation by primordazine treatment and therefore should be present athigher levels in untreated polysomes than in primordazine-treatedpolysomes. Most importantly, a subset of mRNAs can be identified that,like nanos1, are altered in their translation by primordazine treatment.These mRNAs should be over- or under-represented in primordazine-treatedpolysomes. Such RNAs are of great interest because they can helpidentify additional pathways that are regulated by theprimordazine-sensitive RNA processing machinery.

It should be noted that alternative approach of using iTRAQ to detectchanges in protein levels in primordazine-treated animals can be used(Ross et al., Mol Cell Proteomics 2004, 3, 1154-1169). This method hasthe advantage of allowing direct measurement of protein quantities butwould not easily distinguish between translational effects and effectsdue to changes in transcription or protein stability.

Identify direct targets of primordazine. Although the primordazineresponse element in the nanos1 3′ UTR is identified, it is possible thatprimordazine does not act directly on the RNA itself, but rather onproteins upstream of the RNA. It therefore is useful to determine whatthe direct binding partner(s) are for primordazine. An active form ofprimordazine has been synthesized that is covalently linked to Affi-gelbeads, which can be used in combination with state-of-the-art proteomicsto identify the zebrafish proteins that interact with primordazine.

A primordazine derivative is synthesized in which an 8-atom linker wasappended from the indole nitrogen, terminating in a carboxylic acid(FIGS. 4B and 4C). This derivative with linker retained fullPGC-ablating activity in zebrafish embryos, indicating that attachmentof the linker does not interfere with the interaction betweenprimordazine and its binding partners. The derivatized primordazine canthen be coupled to Affi-Gel 102 agarose beads, generating an affinitymatrix that can be used to identify the targets of primordazine (FIGS.4B and 4C).

The active affinity matrix for primordazine can be used to identifyproteins that bind to primordazine. Specific binders can be identifiedusing a quantitative proteomic technique called iTRAQ (isobaric tag forrelative and absolute quantitation) (Ross et al., Mol Cell Proteomics2004, 3, 1154-1169). iTRAQ allows one to identify and quantify all ofthe proteins that bind to a small molecule, even when binding is weak,and to assess the specificity of binding by competition with freecompound. Published protocols for iTRAQ experiments can be found inthese references (Ong et al., PNAS USA 2009, 106, 4617-4622; Unwin etal., Nat. Protoc. 2010, 5, 1574-1582). The process is depicted in FIG.15 and consists of:

(1) mass matings. Large-scale matings of wild-type zebrafishgenerate >10,000 synchronized zebrafish embryos.

(2) deyolking. At 4 hpf, embryos are crushed by mortar and pestle inRinger's buffer on ice. Cells are rinsed and pelleted several times toremove yolk and chorions.

(3) cell lysis. Cells are lysed in Triton-X buffer containing proteaseand phosphatase inhibitors. Lysates are clarified by centrifugation.

(4) binding and competition. Cell lysates are incubated with theprimordazine affinity matrix overnight, with or without competition withexcess free primordazine. Affinity beads are then rinsed briefly withlysis buffer to remove the majority of unbound protein.

(5) isobaric labeling. The two protein samples to be compared (with andwithout competition) are labeled with separate isobaric tags. These tagshave identical chemical properties but different isotopic masses, sothey elute together by liquid chromatography but generate separate peaksby mass spectrometry.

(6) protein quantification. The two protein samples are mixed,trypsinized, and analyzed by LC/MS. Proteins that bind non-specificallyto the affinity matrix should be present with equal amounts of eachisotopic tag. Proteins that bind specifically to primordazine should beenriched for the “no competition” tag relative to the “competition” tag.

It is contemplated that alternative approaches can be used to identifythe relevant targets of primordazine, especially for proteins having lowabundance or with very low solubility in detergent buffers (Zon andPeterson, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2005, 4, 35-44).

Confirm validity of target(s). The exact experiments used to confirm thevalidity of a potential target depends upon the identity of the target,but in every case, confirmation can consist of the following threesteps:

(1) confirming interaction between primordazine and the target. TheiTRAQ experiments can provide one piece of evidence of interactionbetween primordazine and the target, but it is important to confirm theinteraction using an orthogonal approach. If the target protein can bepurified, binding affinity can be tested directly using BIACOREfollowing standard protocols (Jason-Moller et al., Curr Protoc ProteinSci 2006, Chapter 19, Unit 19.13). BIACORE analysis generates accurateinformation on binding affinity and interaction kinetics between aprotein and its small molecule ligand.

(2) testing the effect of primordazine on the target's activity. Many ofthe targets that are discovered have a known enzymatic activity or othercharacterized activity. The second step is to test the effect ofprimordazine on that activity. For example, if the putative target is akinase, the ability of primordazine to alter the kinase activity of thetarget is tested. If the putative target is known to regulatetranscription of a specific gene, the effect of primordazine ontranscription of that gene is tested.

(3) phenocopying the primordazine phenotype by disruption of the target.The putative target can be disrupted using morpholino oligonucleotidesor ZFN-induced mutations and one can determine if target disruptionphenocopies primordazine treatment. The same three assays described forFIGS. 3 & 5 above can be used, namely nanos1 mRNA localization, mRNAtranslation, and PGC maintenance. If disruption of the putative targetmimics primordazine in these assays, it can support the validity of thattarget. A good phenocopy is strong evidence for the relevance of theputative target, and many examples of genetic disruption phenocopying asmall molecule effect exist. In cases where there is no phenocopy oronly a partial phenocopy, approaches, such as titrating the morpholinodose, overexpressing the target, or using alternative pharmacologicaland genetic approaches for gene disruption, can be adopted.

Ability of primordazine to induce sterility in phylogenetically distantfish species. Studies are performed to identify optimal dose, duration,and synergism with other stressors. Sterility is scored in batches oftreated fish of varied genetic backgrounds.

In zebrafish, primordazine interferes with the nanos1 3′UTR-mediatedlocation and translational regulation of nanos, which encodes anevolutionary conserved protein essential for PGC survival. It is shownthat the 3′UTR of nanos is interchangeably functional inphylogenetically distant fish, hence, primordazine should act as amodulator of NANOS expression across teleost species.

In the beginning, primordazine treatment conditions are optimized toachieve maximal ablation of GFP-labeled PGCs in zebrafish. If ablationis incomplete with primordazine alone, additional stressors, such aswarm water treatment, can be implemented. Working in iterative cycles,parameters such as treatment time, dose, genetic background andtemperature can be interrogated. Once determined, these optimalconditions are reassessed for sterility inducing capacity by quantifyinggerm cell-specific gene expression in treated juvenile fish. Ifsterility is confirmed, the potential detrimental off-target effects ofsuch treatment are evaluated throughout the fish development. Similaroptimized conditions and iterative analysis can be applied as a startingpoint for tilapia and trout. Information on treatment conditions withprimordazine is valuable to assess primordazine derivatives which targetthe same biological process.

(1) Identification of Optimal Dose, Timing and Treatment Length.

a. Zebrafish: Primordazine has been tested on a genetically homogeneousstrain with maximal efficacy achieved at hatching water concentrationsof 6 uM. The genetic background-dependant dosage effectiveness is firstinvestigated by evaluating primordazine efficacy in two lines ofzebrafish expressing GFP in PGCs from maternal specific transcripts(zona pellucida promoter). One is an outbred commercial strain, whilethe other is a “golden” aquarium strain homozygous for a mutation inslc24a. For each test treatment, embryos produced from 3 parental pairsper line are assayed. Primordazine likely ablates PGCs by interferingwith their nos1-dependent migration during post-gastrulation stages andas such treatment is initiated prior to the onset of gastrulation andembryos are analyzed when PGCs have reached the genital ridge. Embryosare obtained from spontaneous cage spawning. One to four hpf zebrafishembryos are arrayed into 24 well plates (10 embryos/wells) prefilledwith embryo buffer at 25° C. supplemented with DMSO or varying doses ofprimordazine in two-fold dilution series from 12 uM to 187 nM. At 24hpf, live treated embryos are analyzed under fluorescent microscopy.

b. Trout (O. mykiss): Gametes are purchased from a commercial trout eggsupplier and embryos produced from established in vitro fertilizationprocedures. To document the ability of primordazine to target troutPGCs, synthetic mRNAs—coding GFP fused to the 3′ UTR of nanos1 areprepared from a linearized plasmid (Litmus eGFP:nos1 3′UTR) anddelivered into fertilized, one-cell stage, trout embryos using themicropyle injection technique (CAT's established protocol). Forty tofifty injected embryos are placed in temperature controlled 12° C.recirculating water. Three to five dpf, embryos are split into equalgroups and placed in 12° C. hatching water supplemented with 12 uM, 3uM, 187 nM of primordazine or DMSO respectively. Treatment water isreplaced daily to ensure proper embryo oxygenation. GFP expressionpatterns are examined in dechorionated and deyolked embryos.

c. Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) lines in CAT's facility are derivedfrom a Brazilian strain obtained from a US commercial producer (DesertSprings Tilapia, Ariz.). Embryos are produced from in vitrofertilization. To study PGCs, one can assay embryos from female tilapiacarrying the ZPC5:eGFP:tnos 3′UTR construct which produce embryos withGFP labeled PGCs. Fertilized eggs are placed into hatching water at 28°C. in plastic Petri dishes with gentle stirring. The first cell divisiontakes place approximately two hours post fertilization and gastrulationbegins at 10 hpf. Pregastrula embryos are transferred at time intervalsto 6 well plates (20 embryos/well) prefilled with hatching watersupplemented with 2 fold dilution series of primordazine from 12 uM to187 nM or DMSO (control). Embryos are examined under fluorescentmicroscopy at time intervals.

d. Imaging and data reporting: Embryos are be rinsed with fresh water(FW), mounted in low melt agarose (1% w/v, SeaPlaque GTG) in glasscapillaries (Cambrex Corporation BRAND) and imaged using an AxioCam MRmMonochrome CCD digital camera mounted on a SteREO Discovery V8Stereomicroscope (Zeiss) equipped with LED tube S, with a 38HE filterset for GFP and Zen imaging software (Carl Zeiss International,Germany). Images of 10 embryos per treatment are taken at 24 hpf forzebrafish (at the prim-5 stage, when greater than 95% of PGCs havemigrated into the genital ridge region), 3 dpf for tilapia embryos, andat 14 dpf for trout embryos (The 70-somite stage when clusters ofGFP-expressing cells have formed a single cluster above the intestine).For each model, the capture settings, magnification and focus plane arestandardized. PGC development can be analyzed by counting the number ofPGCs on either side of the genital ridges, and the number of ectopicPGCs is recorded as well. GFP intensity at the genital ridges can beanalyzed using Zen lite image treatment software (Zeiss). Each treatmentgroup can be represented by a data plot where x represents the averagePGC number, and y the average GFP intensity at the genital ridge. Meantotal PGCs is statistically compared using an unpaired t test.Significance is accepted when P<0.05. Evidence of functionality in allexperiments is indicated if GFP-PGCs are significantly reduced in numberwhen compared to control embryos that were not treated withprimordazine.

(2). Treatment Optimization and Confirmation of Sterility

If PGC ablation with primordazine treatment alone is incomplete,primordazine can be combined with a short exposure to high temperature.The molecular changes induced by this stressor may have cumulative orsynergistic activity on PGC ablation.

a. Warm water treatment: Control or primordazine treated embryos (60, 40and 20 for zebrafish, tilapia and trout respectively per group) areplaced in beakers immersed in a temperature controlled water bath (Table1). At time intervals embryos are transferred to a Petri dish forGFP-PGCs analysis as described earlier.

TABLE 1 Temperature treatment and control for fish species Warmtemperature Treatment duration Fish species treatment and control Fromgastrulation onward Zebrafish 34° C. versus 27° C. 12 hrs Tilapia 35° C.versus 27° C. 24-48 hrs Trout 17° C. versus 12° C. 2-3 days

b. Confirmation of sterility at the molecular level. Treated embryoslacking visible PGCs and non treated controls, are raised until completeabsorption of the yolk sac (45-50 dpf in trout, 30 dpf in tilapia and 25dpf in zebrafish). For each group, 10 juveniles are sacrificed (MS222)and the abdominal segment containing the gonad (removing head, tail andviscera) are sectioned off. RNA is extracted from the remaining tissueand the corresponding cDNA is screened by QPCR using TaqMan probes(Applied Biosystems) for vasa, a germ cell specific gene (Raz, GenomeBiol. 2000, 1, 1017.1-1017.6) (accession #AB032467, CF752544, NM_131057for tilapia, trout and zebrafish respectively). Q-PCRs for each sampleare performed in triplicate and level of expression is normalized to aset of host house-keeping genes (Vandesompele et al., Genome Biology2002, 3, p. research0034) (β-actin, ef1α and rpl13α). No expression ofvasa should be in sterile fish.

(3) Documentation of Non-Toxicity in All Three Species of Interest

Primordazine was discovered in a whole organism approach, and effectivedoses appear to have no visible effect on development or organogenesis,suggesting that primordazine disrupts a PGC specific process. However,toxicity may not be apparent at the morphological level but rather atthe cellular level. Tilapia and trout might also show altered toxicitycompared to zebrafish. While the treatment is restricted to earlyembryonic development, it is possible that negative effect may becomeapparent only on traits that are expressed at the juvenile or adultstage. Ultimately, fish performance evaluation throughout their lifecycle can address this issue.

To detect primordazine-induced necrotic or apoptotic activity in somatictissue, acridine orange staining and TUNEL labeling on embryos are used.Morphohological malformations and developmental delays are alsoassessed. Finally, to verify that primordazine treatment during earlydevelopmental stage does not result in metabolism alteration leading togrowth retardation, tank grow out trials are conduct to determine sexualdifferentiation and fish performance.

a. Acridine orange stains cells with disturbed plasma membranepermeability so it preferentially stains necrotic or very late apoptoticcells. Embryos are rinsed with FW and then incubated in 100 μl of 5μg/ml acridine orange for one hour in the dark at 28° C. Embryos areexamined under fluorescent microscopy and the number of fluorescentcells is scored.

b. TUNEL labeling: Detection and quantification of apoptosis areperformed using an In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit (TMR red Roche,Nutley, N.J.) following the manufacturer's protocol. 36 hpf embryos aredechorionated and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 1 hour at roomtemperature. Fixed embryos are washed with PBS twice and permeabilizedwith 0.1% sodium citrate, 0.1% TritonX for 2 minutes on ice. Afterwashing twice in PBS, samples are incubated with the reaction mixturecontaining the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase and TMR labelednucleotides for 1 hour in the dark at 37 C. The reaction is stopped bywashing with PBS three times. The fluorescent signal is visualized andimaged as described above (imaging and data reporting).

c. Deformities are scored /control non treated group. Specifically,malformation such as yolk sac edema, pericardial edema, axialedema/blistering, axial malformations (crooked/clubbed) are tabulatedusing a scale of 1 to 3, with 1 representing a normal phenotype and 3 anon viable deformed embryo. Each image is read blind by two reviewers.

d. Tank grow out trials. To generate groups used for these trials,embryos from single-paired crossings (minimum of three separate crosses)are exposed to 1) optimized treatment resulting in complete PGC ablation(i.e sterile, all male) 2) no treatment (i.e fertile control group).Treatment and control embryos (zebrafish and tilapia) are rearedseparately using established hatchery procedures. At the feeding stage,half of the control is sex reversed using standard androgen treatmentprotocols (feeding methyl testosterone incorporated into feed). At ˜1month of age (10 g), tilapia from the treatment and control/sex-reversedgroups (n=50-100/group) is weighed, pit-tagged and held together in100-liter tanks in a recirculating culture system maintained at 27° C.(12 H light: 12 H dark). All fish is fed twice daily, to satiation,using a commercially prepared grow-out diet (Ziegler Feeds). At ˜3 weeksof age zebrafish from each treatment group (n=60) is placed in 8 L tanks(n=20 fish/tank) and raised separately. Each fish is individuallyweighed and measured at 4-week intervals over a 24 week period. Malesare identified, visually, based on their body shape, color, absence ofuro-genital papillae or structure of the uro-genital orifice. At the endof the experiment, fish is sacrificed and gonadal structure dissected(n=20 per group) fixed in Bouin's solution, dehydrated and infiltratedwith paraffin for sectioning. Each section is read blind by tworeviewers. Sterility is apparent from a complete absence of spermatozoain the tubule lumen. Each section is assigned a score using aqualitative scale: grade 1=normal gonad, grade 2=gonad with depletedgerm cells, grade 3=gonad with absent germ cells. Individual weightsfrom fish assigned as either ‘Male/Fertile’ (testis with germ cell) or‘Male/Sterile’ (testis without germ cell) are plotted over time andaveraged weights (from at least 50 fish/group) are compared betweengroups using Student t Test. Individual fish that could not be assignedto these 2 groups (i.e. “Female’) is discarded from the analysis.

Example 11 Treating Tilapia with Primordazine

Method

Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) lines used in this study are derivedfrom a Brazilian strain obtained from a US commercial producer.

To study PGCs, assays were performed on embryos from female tilapiacarrying the Zpc5:eGFP:tnos 3′UTR construct which produce embryos withGFP labeled PGCs. The tilapia Zpc5 promoter is an oocyte specificpromoter, active during oogenesis prior to the first meiotic division.As such, all embryos from an heterozygous transgenic female inherit theeGFP:tnos 3′UTR mRNA, which localizes and become expressed exclusivelyin PGCs through the action of cis-acting RNA element in their 3′UTR(tilapia nanos 3′UTR). In this system GFP expression in the embryo isstrictly maternal. Thus, similarly to zebrafish nos1 3′UTR, tilapiananos 3′ UTR (tnos 3′UTR) can deliver mRNA and subsequently heterologousprotein expression to the PGCs in developing embryos. In this line, GFPexpression is first observed in 2 day old embryos, progeny of transgenicfemale. At 3 days post fertilization (dpf) in 28° C. water,GFP-expressing cells coalesced in two bilateral rows on the midlineabove the intestine (FIG. 41A). The GFP labeled primordial germ cell canbe visualized for up to 6 days post fertilization but fluorescencestarts to fade between days 4&5.

Primordazine treatment: Embryos at different developmental stages wereplaced into hatching water at 28° C. in plastic Petri dishes with gentlestirring. The first cell division takes place approximately two hourspost fertilization (hpf) and gastrulation begins at around 10 hpf. Wetransferred pre-gastrula (2 hpf, 5 hpf) and post-gastrula embryos (15hpf) to 96 well plates (1-2 embryos/well) prefilled with hatching watersupplemented with 2 fold dilution series of primordazine from 20 uM to2.5 uM or DMSO (control). The 96 well plate was placed under gentlestirring in a temperature control room at 28° C. At time intervals,embryos were analyzed for GFP expression under a fluorescence dissectingmicroscope (Zeiss Stereo Discovery.V8) equipped with a GFP filter set.To quantify primordazine activity, 3 day old embryos were placed infresh water and PGCs were counted. At this stage, in the non-treatedcontrol group, approximately 95% of PGCs have migrated to the genitalridges.

Results [000237] To evaluate if temporally controlled treatment withprimordazine can modulate PGC development in tilapia, 5 hours oldtilapia embryos were first exposed to 2 fold dilution series ofprimordazine from 20 uM to 2.5 uM at 28° C. Primordazine treated embryosshowed a reduction in the number of GFP labeled PGCs in a dose dependantmanner. After 3 days, an average of 67% and 47% reduction in PGCs numberwere measured at 20 uM and 10 uM respectively compare to the controlgroup (FIG. 39). Additionally, the level of GFP intensity in PGCs wasreduced in primordazine treated embryos. These results parallel thoseobserved in zebrafish, where primordazine was found to alter thelocalization and translation of nanos1 RNA in germ cells, leading toloss of germ cells. Nile tilapia and zebrafish show similar sensitivityto the same range of primordazine concentrations. In both fish speciesprimordazine can apparently cross the chorion and penetrate embryoniccell layers.

To test in tilapia if the time of first exposure to primordazine affectsthe level of PGC ablation, 1-2 cell stage embryos (2 hpf) as well as 13hour old embryos were treated with varied doses of primordazine. Apositive correlation was found between early exposure and sensitivity toprimordazine. For example, exposure to 5 uM of primordazine reduces PGCsnumber by 72% when the treatment begins at 2hpf but only by 41% at thelater time point. Similar results were observed across the range ofprimordazine concentration tested with enhanced PGCs ablation capacityin the earlier treatment (FIG. 40).

These findings suggest that primordazine acts in early developmentalstage of tilapia much like what was found in zebrafish. These resultspoint to a conserved mode of action of primordazine between Nile tilapiaand zebrafish. Primordazine represents a promising new approach forcontrolling fish fertility and can be broadly applicable to multiplespecies of fish.

What is claimed is:
 1. A compound of Formula (I):

wherein each R₁, R₂, and R₃ is independently hydrogen; halogen; cyclicor acyclic, substituted or unsubstituted, branched or unbranchedaliphatic; cyclic or acyclic, substituted or unsubstituted, branched orunbranched heteroaliphatic; substituted or unsubstituted, branched orunbranched acyl; substituted or unsubstituted, branched or unbranchedaryl; substituted or unsubstituted, branched or unbranched heteroaryl;—C(═O)R^(B); —CO₂R^(B); —; —CN; —SCN; —SR^(B); —SOR^(B); —SO₂R^(B);—NO₂; —N(R^(B))₂; —NHC(O)R^(B); or —C(R^(B))₃; wherein each occurrenceof R^(B) is independently hydrogen; halogen; a protecting group;aliphatic; heteroaliphatic; acyl; aryl moiety; heteroaryl; hydroxyl;aloxy; aryloxy; alkylthioxy; arylthioxy; amino; alkylamino;dialkylamino; heteroaryloxy; heteroarylthioxy; or alkylhalo; each R isindependently halogen; cyclic or acyclic, substituted or unsubstituted,branched or unbranched aliphatic; cyclic or acyclic, substituted orunsubstituted, branched or unbranched heteroaliphatic; substituted orunsubstituted, branched or unbranched acyl; substituted orunsubstituted, branched or unbranched aryl; substituted orunsubstituted, branched or unbranched heteroaryl; —C(═O)R^(B);—CO₂R^(B); —; —CN; —SCN; —SR^(B); —SOR^(B); —SO₂R^(B); —NO_(2;)—N(R^(B))₂; —NHC(O)R^(B); or —C(R^(B))₃; wherein each occurrence ofR^(B) is independently hydrogen; halogen; a protecting group; aliphatic;heteroaliphatic; acyl; aryl moiety; heteroaryl; hydroxyl; aloxy;aryloxy; alkylthioxy; arylthioxy; amino; alkylamino; dialkylamino;heteroaryloxy; heteroarylthioxy; or alkylhalo.; and n is an integer 0 to4 inclusive, with the provisos that: (i) when n is 0, R₁ is ethyl and R₂is ethyl, then R₃ is not 5-methylisoxazol-3-yl; (ii) when n is 0, R₁ isethyl and R₂ is ethyl, then R₃ is not 1-phenylethyl; (iii) when n is 0,R₁ is ethyl and R₂ is ethyl, then R₃ is not 4-(N-hydroxynitrosyl)phenyl;(iv) when n is 0, R₁ is ethyl and R₂ is H, then R₃ is not4-(N,N-dimethylcarbamoyl)phenyl; (v) when n is 0, R₁ is ethyl and R₂ isH, then R₃ is not 4-carbamoylphenyl; and (vi) when n is 0, R₁ is propyland R₂ is H, then R₃ is not 1-phenylethyl.
 2. The compound of claim 1,wherein n is 0; R₁ is hydrogen or a substituted or unsubstituted,branched or unbranched C₁-C₈ alkyl, or R₁ is a linker to a solidsupport; R₂ is hydrogen or a substituted or unsubstituted, branched orunbranched C₁-C₈ alkyl; and R₃ is hydrogen, a substituted orunsubstituted aryl, or a substituted or unsubstituted alkylheteroaryl.3. The compound of claim 1, wherein R1 is C1-C4 alkyl.
 4. The compoundof claim 3, wherein R1 is methyl, ethyl, propyl or n-butyl.
 5. Thecompound of claim 1, wherein R₂ is hydrogen or C₁-C₄ alkyl.
 6. Thecompound of claim 5, wherein R₂ is hydrogen or ethyl.
 7. The compound ofclaim 1, wherein R3 is an unsubstituted phenyl or a substituted phenyl.8. The compound of claim 7, wherein R3 is a phenyl substituted withacetyl or a halogen.
 9. The compound of claim 1, wherein R3 isfuranylmethyl.
 10. The compound of claim 1, wherein the compound isselected from the group consisting of:


11. A fish embryo, wherein translation of an mRNA comprising aprimordazine response element (PRE) is reduced after treatment with acompound of formula (I), as compared to untreated fish, wherein compoundof Formula (I) is:

wherein each R₁, R₂, and R₃ is independently hydrogen; halogen; cyclicor acyclic, substituted or unsubstituted, branched or unbranchedaliphatic; cyclic or acyclic, substituted or unsubstituted, branched orunbranched heteroaliphatic; substituted or unsubstituted, branched orunbranched acyl; substituted or unsubstituted, branched or unbranchedaryl; substituted or unsubstituted, branched or unbranched heteroaryl;—C(═O)R^(B); —CO₂R^(B); —; —CN; —SCN; —SR^(B); —SOR^(B); -SO₂R^(B);—NO₂; —N(R^(B))₂; —NHC(O)R^(B); or —C(R^(B))₃; wherein each occurrenceof R^(B) is independently hydrogen; halogen; a protecting group;aliphatic; heteroaliphatic; acyl; aryl moiety; heteroaryl; hydroxyl;aloxy; aryloxy; alkylthioxy; arylthioxy; amino; alkylamino;dialkylamino; heteroaryloxy; heteroarylthioxy; or alkylhalo; each R isindependently halogen; cyclic or acyclic, substituted or unsubstituted,branched or unbranched aliphatic; cyclic or acyclic, substituted orunsubstituted, branched or unbranched heteroaliphatic; substituted orunsubstituted, branched or unbranched acyl; substituted orunsubstituted, branched or unbranched aryl; substituted orunsubstituted, branched or unbranched heteroaryl; —C(═O)R^(B);—CO₂R^(B); —; —CN; —SCN; —SR^(B); —SOR^(B); —SO₂R^(B); —NO₂; —N(R^(B))₂;—NHC(O)R^(B); or —C(R^(B))₃; wherein each occurrence of R^(B) isindependently hydrogen; halogen; a protecting group; aliphatic;heteroaliphatic; acyl; aryl moiety; heteroaryl; hydroxyl; aloxy;aryloxy; alkylthioxy; arylthioxy; amino; alkylamino; dialkylamino;heteroaryloxy; heteroarylthioxy; or alkylhalo; and n is an integer 0 to4 inclusive, with the provisos that: (i) when n is 0, R₁ is ethyl and R₂is ethyl, then R₃ is not 5-methylisoxazol-3-yl; (ii) when n is 0, R₁ isethyl and R₂ is ethyl, then R₃ is not 1-phenylethyl; (iii) when n is 0,R₁ is ethyl and R₂ is ethyl, then R₃ is not 4-(N-hydroxynitrosyl)phenyl;(iv) when n is 0, R₁ is ethyl and R₂ is H, then R₃ is not4-(N,N-dimethylcarbamoyl)phenyl; (v) when n is 0, R₁ is ethyl and R₂ isH, then R₃ is not 4-carbamoylphenyl; and (vi) when n is 0, R₁ is propyland R₂ is H, then R₃ is not 1-phenylethyl.
 12. The fish embryo of claim11, wherein the mRNA is nanos1 or deadend.
 13. A fish germ cell, whereinnanos1 mRNA is localized to discrete puncta.